<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Puny God: What Worked &#038; What Didn&#8217;t In &#8216;The Avengers&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Michael Kontaxis		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118369</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael Kontaxis]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118369</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear whoever wrote this... Don&#x27;t let fanboy commenters get you down. Your article is perfect. Yes, the film was great (in my eyes one of the top 2 best comic book film of all time) but its flawed. My biggest issues were the villains and the ridiculous threat&#x2F;bizarre plot. But the fact that the film worked so well nonetheless is a testament to it. The humor in particular was top-notch.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear whoever wrote this&#8230; Don&#x27;t let fanboy commenters get you down. Your article is perfect. Yes, the film was great (in my eyes one of the top 2 best comic book film of all time) but its flawed. My biggest issues were the villains and the ridiculous threat&#x2F;bizarre plot. But the fact that the film worked so well nonetheless is a testament to it. The humor in particular was top-notch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118357</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118357</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[My only question is once Iron Man is in space how the hell does he just fall back to Earth and through the portal? Cause correct me if I&#x27;m wrong but there is no gravity in space, so wouldn&#x27;t he just float off and die??? Besides that huge plot hole it was a pretty good movie. Thor 2 better not get f*ck*d up cause I am straight jacked for that.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My only question is once Iron Man is in space how the hell does he just fall back to Earth and through the portal? Cause correct me if I&#x27;m wrong but there is no gravity in space, so wouldn&#x27;t he just float off and die??? Besides that huge plot hole it was a pretty good movie. Thor 2 better not get f*ck*d up cause I am straight jacked for that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zach		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118373</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zach]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118373</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So I think whoever wrote this just went for 5 and 5 because of the symmetry...never mind the fact that the complaints are at best nit-picking.

1. The pacing in the film is great. One thing Whedon has always been good at was pacing. Not an insane start, but it builds, which of course this movie did.

2. Fair point, we should have more Hawkeye.

3. Okay, not a terrible point, but it worked. Read the original Avengers. Loki&#x27;s only goal was to use the Hulk to cause some destruction.

4. Can&#x27;t say I agree, but whatever. We don&#x27;t know that Fury abandoned using the tesseract to make weapons, he&#x27;s just waiting to see what the heroes can do first. I highly doubt he has a change of heart. If I know the character the way I think I do, phase 2 was being continued during the whole final battle just in case it didn&#x27;t work out.

5. You can&#x27;t say this movie gets the heroes right and then complain that the newscasters don&#x27;t do justice to the chaos or the implications of aliens....again this was true to the comics. Either they go for hyper realism or they get the comics right. They got them right, which you pointed out. They put the comics back into the whole thing.

Last but not least, this is a side note....but I really hate the insinuation that extra terrestrial life means &#034;all religions just got a MASSIVE page one rewrite.&#034; That&#x27;s just an ignorant assumption from someone who doesn&#x27;t understand religion. If alien life exists elsewhere, or if there are parallel universes it doesn&#x27;t disprove anything. It just means there&#x27;s more than we&#x27;re aware of. I mean no matter what religion you are, if your god created the world and didn&#x27;t tell you he created others that doesn&#x27;t prove anything. I think most faith&#x27;s agree that their god(s) don&#x27;t OWE them anything. A simple analogy: Just because you go to a friend&#x27;s house, look at his refrigerator and see people&#x27;s pictures you&#x27;ve never met doesn&#x27;t mean your friend is a lie....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So I think whoever wrote this just went for 5 and 5 because of the symmetry&#8230;never mind the fact that the complaints are at best nit-picking.</p>
<p>1. The pacing in the film is great. One thing Whedon has always been good at was pacing. Not an insane start, but it builds, which of course this movie did.</p>
<p>2. Fair point, we should have more Hawkeye.</p>
<p>3. Okay, not a terrible point, but it worked. Read the original Avengers. Loki&#x27;s only goal was to use the Hulk to cause some destruction.</p>
<p>4. Can&#x27;t say I agree, but whatever. We don&#x27;t know that Fury abandoned using the tesseract to make weapons, he&#x27;s just waiting to see what the heroes can do first. I highly doubt he has a change of heart. If I know the character the way I think I do, phase 2 was being continued during the whole final battle just in case it didn&#x27;t work out.</p>
<p>5. You can&#x27;t say this movie gets the heroes right and then complain that the newscasters don&#x27;t do justice to the chaos or the implications of aliens&#8230;.again this was true to the comics. Either they go for hyper realism or they get the comics right. They got them right, which you pointed out. They put the comics back into the whole thing.</p>
<p>Last but not least, this is a side note&#8230;.but I really hate the insinuation that extra terrestrial life means &quot;all religions just got a MASSIVE page one rewrite.&quot; That&#x27;s just an ignorant assumption from someone who doesn&#x27;t understand religion. If alien life exists elsewhere, or if there are parallel universes it doesn&#x27;t disprove anything. It just means there&#x27;s more than we&#x27;re aware of. I mean no matter what religion you are, if your god created the world and didn&#x27;t tell you he created others that doesn&#x27;t prove anything. I think most faith&#x27;s agree that their god(s) don&#x27;t OWE them anything. A simple analogy: Just because you go to a friend&#x27;s house, look at his refrigerator and see people&#x27;s pictures you&#x27;ve never met doesn&#x27;t mean your friend is a lie&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Daisy		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118372</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daisy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118372</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Loki didn&#x27;t go to Jotunheim because maybe, just maybe because he betrayed and killed Laufey, revealing his true plan to use Laufey&#x27;s attempt on Odin&#x27;s life as an excuse to destroy Jotunheim with the Bifrost Bridge and proving himself to Odin]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Loki didn&#x27;t go to Jotunheim because maybe, just maybe because he betrayed and killed Laufey, revealing his true plan to use Laufey&#x27;s attempt on Odin&#x27;s life as an excuse to destroy Jotunheim with the Bifrost Bridge and proving himself to Odin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bryant		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118374</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bryant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118374</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great article if you ignore the second page. Maybe some things didn&#x27;t work, but Hawkeye was in NO WAY one of these things. I could argue against the rest, but the other comments are pretty much handling that already.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article if you ignore the second page. Maybe some things didn&#x27;t work, but Hawkeye was in NO WAY one of these things. I could argue against the rest, but the other comments are pretty much handling that already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Gabriel		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118378</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gabriel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118378</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why doesnât Loki go about assembling an army from Jotunheim to conquer the Chitauri, then set two alien races upon the earth?

Oh I don&#x27;t know, maybe because he betrayed and killed Laufey, revealing his true plan to use Laufey&#x27;s attempt on Odin&#x27;s life as an excuse to destroy Jotunheim with the BifrÃ¶st Bridge, proving himself worthy to his  father.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why doesnât Loki go about assembling an army from Jotunheim to conquer the Chitauri, then set two alien races upon the earth?</p>
<p>Oh I don&#x27;t know, maybe because he betrayed and killed Laufey, revealing his true plan to use Laufey&#x27;s attempt on Odin&#x27;s life as an excuse to destroy Jotunheim with the BifrÃ¶st Bridge, proving himself worthy to his  father.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Emir		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118379</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emir]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118379</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This is bullshit, obviously the guy who wrote this artical must really hate the avengers. Almost all the bad things he wrote about it is not true a all. The opening was good, Hiddleston played a awesome loki, it&#x27;s NOT plotless and the ending was very good, giving you some to think about. I have to admit that it was right about Hawkeye, perhaps he was a litte wasted and after the movie I was kinda wondering where Wat machine was.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is bullshit, obviously the guy who wrote this artical must really hate the avengers. Almost all the bad things he wrote about it is not true a all. The opening was good, Hiddleston played a awesome loki, it&#x27;s NOT plotless and the ending was very good, giving you some to think about. I have to admit that it was right about Hawkeye, perhaps he was a litte wasted and after the movie I was kinda wondering where Wat machine was.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Sally		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118380</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sally]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118380</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Gotta disagree on the weak villains; The dragon Chitauri ship thing was badass and Loki is, if not one of my favorite character, my favorite villain. Tom Hiddleston did an amazing job as Loki and you know why he&#x27;s angry and wants to conquer earth because you&#x27;ve seen Thor! Alot of these points, like about the ending and no plot bit, they can all be answered in the previous movies or in the following Marvel movies.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gotta disagree on the weak villains; The dragon Chitauri ship thing was badass and Loki is, if not one of my favorite character, my favorite villain. Tom Hiddleston did an amazing job as Loki and you know why he&#x27;s angry and wants to conquer earth because you&#x27;ve seen Thor! Alot of these points, like about the ending and no plot bit, they can all be answered in the previous movies or in the following Marvel movies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Morgie		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118381</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Morgie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118381</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Oh, awesome! Another article about the Avengers. I can&#x27;t wait to read, &#034;Five Things I Smelled While Watching The Avengers&#034; and &#034;Top Ten Performances by Background Extras in The Avengers&#034;. Fuck me, this is getting ridiculous.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, awesome! Another article about the Avengers. I can&#x27;t wait to read, &quot;Five Things I Smelled While Watching The Avengers&quot; and &quot;Top Ten Performances by Background Extras in The Avengers&quot;. Fuck me, this is getting ridiculous.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: NowCompleteWith		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118382</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[NowCompleteWith]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118382</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You do know that all the answers you want from the ending are easy to infer and will be answered in future movies (Oh  yeah millions of people were saved by the Avengers and that would be a bigger story than those lost, and they even have a scene in the montage of people grieving together, but the fact that they were saved is a bigger deal)?  You also know where Cap is going: he&#x27;s going to find Peggy and eventually stumble upon her niece Sharon.  Clint and Nat are going to go do what they do but they are still technically SHIELD agents.  This leaves Thor and Loki to deal with probably something far worse than Loki in The Almighty Thor.  Which finally leaves us with Bruce and Tony heading off to California and then China.  Where Tony will probably need his friend Bruce, to battle something called FING FANG FOOM.  Rhodey might show up as well but while the lack of shout out to Rhodey is glaring, he does not work for Stark Industries, and is an officer in the US Air Force.  He&#x27;s also across the country in California.

You also doubting they will assemble again, after a 200m dollar opening is pretty damn funny.  They are the Avengers and will assemble when called.  They heed the call.  It&#x27;s who they are.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You do know that all the answers you want from the ending are easy to infer and will be answered in future movies (Oh  yeah millions of people were saved by the Avengers and that would be a bigger story than those lost, and they even have a scene in the montage of people grieving together, but the fact that they were saved is a bigger deal)?  You also know where Cap is going: he&#x27;s going to find Peggy and eventually stumble upon her niece Sharon.  Clint and Nat are going to go do what they do but they are still technically SHIELD agents.  This leaves Thor and Loki to deal with probably something far worse than Loki in The Almighty Thor.  Which finally leaves us with Bruce and Tony heading off to California and then China.  Where Tony will probably need his friend Bruce, to battle something called FING FANG FOOM.  Rhodey might show up as well but while the lack of shout out to Rhodey is glaring, he does not work for Stark Industries, and is an officer in the US Air Force.  He&#x27;s also across the country in California.</p>
<p>You also doubting they will assemble again, after a 200m dollar opening is pretty damn funny.  They are the Avengers and will assemble when called.  They heed the call.  It&#x27;s who they are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: cirkusfolk		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118383</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[cirkusfolk]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118383</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I disagree about Loki.  Hiddleston was the surprise in Thor and here he is even better.  Yes, he&#x27;s sneers but does so so deliciously he&#x27;s as good as a villian as jeff Bridges was in Iron Man.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I disagree about Loki.  Hiddleston was the surprise in Thor and here he is even better.  Yes, he&#x27;s sneers but does so so deliciously he&#x27;s as good as a villian as jeff Bridges was in Iron Man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason todd		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118377</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason todd]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118377</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The guy who wrote this is an over-anal comic book nerd he bags on all the stuff that wasnt bad
He reminds me of a rocketeer superfan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The guy who wrote this is an over-anal comic book nerd he bags on all the stuff that wasnt bad<br />
He reminds me of a rocketeer superfan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jimbo		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118370</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jimbo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118370</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hulk had his moments but has everyone gone doolally? Could someone explain to me how, in the first half of the movie, Hulk can&#x27;t control his anger and wants to annihilate Black Widow and anything and everything, and then conveniently, in the second half of the movie, he can stand still and be cool and obedient, and be sentient and engaged...? It just doesn&#x27;t compute!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hulk had his moments but has everyone gone doolally? Could someone explain to me how, in the first half of the movie, Hulk can&#x27;t control his anger and wants to annihilate Black Widow and anything and everything, and then conveniently, in the second half of the movie, he can stand still and be cool and obedient, and be sentient and engaged&#8230;? It just doesn&#x27;t compute!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118371</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118371</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[They reel off some clunky technojargon

&#034;There may not be a minimum safe distance!&#034;

&#034;Then get all the protypes for phase 2 on a truck and out of here then!&#034;

&#034;is that really a priority&#034;

&#034;ON THE TRUCK NOW!&#034;

Yeah, TOTAL technojargon...  ???  and not a *plot* point at all]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They reel off some clunky technojargon</p>
<p>&quot;There may not be a minimum safe distance!&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;Then get all the protypes for phase 2 on a truck and out of here then!&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;is that really a priority&quot;</p>
<p>&quot;ON THE TRUCK NOW!&quot;</p>
<p>Yeah, TOTAL technojargon&#8230;  ???  and not a *plot* point at all</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: HombreGato		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118368</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[HombreGato]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118368</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#x27;s &#034;Rhodey&#034; not &#034;Rhodesy&#034; but that&#x27;s the only thing I have to correct. There isn&#x27;t anything here that I don&#x27;t agree with and I&#x27;m the kind of read-every-issue Avengers fan who you should expect to trounce all over your high-brow film critical ignorance. In fact, I&#x27;ll add that CGI was overused. Why can&#x27;t a stuntman or Chris Evans himself jump six feet with a running start? Why did they spend money animating a cartoon character to perform this basic feat? The Avengers was pretty decent but people need to calm down with the Kool-Aid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#x27;s &quot;Rhodey&quot; not &quot;Rhodesy&quot; but that&#x27;s the only thing I have to correct. There isn&#x27;t anything here that I don&#x27;t agree with and I&#x27;m the kind of read-every-issue Avengers fan who you should expect to trounce all over your high-brow film critical ignorance. In fact, I&#x27;ll add that CGI was overused. Why can&#x27;t a stuntman or Chris Evans himself jump six feet with a running start? Why did they spend money animating a cartoon character to perform this basic feat? The Avengers was pretty decent but people need to calm down with the Kool-Aid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: X		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118367</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118367</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The second part of this article is rather weak and it really just goes to show how awesome The Avengers movie is, that people have to struggle to find the weak spots. Most of the attempted reasoning don&#x27;t work because the whole goddam movie was like a giant steamroll that levels everything in its path and doesn&#x27;t let the glaring holes jar our attention for a moment. That&#x27;s why the absence of plot doesn&#x27;t matter - it&#x27;s more like going to watch a WWF match, where you go for the sheer adrenaline and not the dramatics.

I found the opening ironic, and perhaps deliberately so, because it so out of sync with the rest of the film&#x27;s mood. Then again. It is also a pretty workable metaphor as a peek into Loki&#x27;s soul - all dark, obscure and with a hint of despair about it. I don&#x27;t mind missing Hawkeye because we never had a relationship with him from the previous movies, so this is his jumping off point whereas the others already had theirs in the other movies. Besides, we already had so many character stories to keep track of on screen.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The second part of this article is rather weak and it really just goes to show how awesome The Avengers movie is, that people have to struggle to find the weak spots. Most of the attempted reasoning don&#x27;t work because the whole goddam movie was like a giant steamroll that levels everything in its path and doesn&#x27;t let the glaring holes jar our attention for a moment. That&#x27;s why the absence of plot doesn&#x27;t matter &#8211; it&#x27;s more like going to watch a WWF match, where you go for the sheer adrenaline and not the dramatics.</p>
<p>I found the opening ironic, and perhaps deliberately so, because it so out of sync with the rest of the film&#x27;s mood. Then again. It is also a pretty workable metaphor as a peek into Loki&#x27;s soul &#8211; all dark, obscure and with a hint of despair about it. I don&#x27;t mind missing Hawkeye because we never had a relationship with him from the previous movies, so this is his jumping off point whereas the others already had theirs in the other movies. Besides, we already had so many character stories to keep track of on screen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: X		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118366</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[X]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118366</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Given that, I&#x27;m not an Avengers apologist. So my biggest beef with the movie - and a real weak point, to me - is that they used yet another alien invasion to rally the troops. So, okay, yeah, somewhat truthful to the comics, maybe, but do we really need to see yet another alien invasion on screen? I think they should have made The Avengers face off against a global supervillain team headed by Loki instead. That would have expanded the Marvel movie universe tremendously, when you are made to realise that the US does not have a monopoly on superheroes. Then the following Marvel movies could go globetrotting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Given that, I&#x27;m not an Avengers apologist. So my biggest beef with the movie &#8211; and a real weak point, to me &#8211; is that they used yet another alien invasion to rally the troops. So, okay, yeah, somewhat truthful to the comics, maybe, but do we really need to see yet another alien invasion on screen? I think they should have made The Avengers face off against a global supervillain team headed by Loki instead. That would have expanded the Marvel movie universe tremendously, when you are made to realise that the US does not have a monopoly on superheroes. Then the following Marvel movies could go globetrotting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Simon		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118365</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118365</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#x27;m fascinated by how polarizing having slightly different opinions on The Avengers can be. It&#x27;s not as if there&#x27;s been a serious negative review of the movie-- even septuagenarian Joe Morgenstern&#x27;s &#034;fitfully enjoyable&#034; review at the Wall Street Journal included a caveat that he was feeling particularly cranky that day, due to bad 3D glasses. But even to suggest that the film was imperfect seems heresy to some, who consider it the epitome of cinematic art. It&#x27;s certainly an enjoyable, entertaining flick, but hardly perfect. Whedon well deserves the plaudits for handing a difficult juggling act, under a tight filming schedule, to craft a true &#034;comic book&#034; movie.  It&#x27;s just that, yes, it could have been even better.

A week ago, I wrote a similar piece-- on Whedonverse.net, no less-- covering what I saw as weaknesses in the movie. The review above hits most of them. We&#x27;re told that the first cut of the film ran 3 hours -- with 30 minutes to appear as extras on disc. Perhaps some of the excised parts might fill in the cracks. Although, there&#x27;s not much to be done with how minimally threatening and one-dimensional the Chitauri are as an alien conquering army. The greatest threat in the end is man-made, in the form of the cliched alien ship-killing nuke. You&#x27;d think by now they would have a defence against such &#034;primitive&#034; technology.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;m fascinated by how polarizing having slightly different opinions on The Avengers can be. It&#x27;s not as if there&#x27;s been a serious negative review of the movie&#8211; even septuagenarian Joe Morgenstern&#x27;s &quot;fitfully enjoyable&quot; review at the Wall Street Journal included a caveat that he was feeling particularly cranky that day, due to bad 3D glasses. But even to suggest that the film was imperfect seems heresy to some, who consider it the epitome of cinematic art. It&#x27;s certainly an enjoyable, entertaining flick, but hardly perfect. Whedon well deserves the plaudits for handing a difficult juggling act, under a tight filming schedule, to craft a true &quot;comic book&quot; movie.  It&#x27;s just that, yes, it could have been even better.</p>
<p>A week ago, I wrote a similar piece&#8211; on Whedonverse.net, no less&#8211; covering what I saw as weaknesses in the movie. The review above hits most of them. We&#x27;re told that the first cut of the film ran 3 hours &#8212; with 30 minutes to appear as extras on disc. Perhaps some of the excised parts might fill in the cracks. Although, there&#x27;s not much to be done with how minimally threatening and one-dimensional the Chitauri are as an alien conquering army. The greatest threat in the end is man-made, in the form of the cliched alien ship-killing nuke. You&#x27;d think by now they would have a defence against such &quot;primitive&quot; technology.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: @cinejordan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118364</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[@cinejordan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118364</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You guys need to get laid.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You guys need to get laid.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zinjo		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118363</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zinjo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118363</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[You pretty much nailed it on most counts.
I hadn&#x27;t considered the War Machine angle, but I also didn&#x27;t miss him either, so that is what it is.
As for Hawkeye, does anyone REALLY believe there won&#x27;t  be a Hawkeye movie?  Make no mistake that Renner is expecting a big paycheque when his turn comes round.  I agree we aren&#x27;t that vested in the arrow thrower, but when he finally arrives on the light side, we are impressed.  Not a great redemption, but a redemption moment after a fashion.
Despite it&#x27;s flaws, it will stand equally with Nolan&#x27;s Dark Knight trilogy as a benchmark of what a Comic book movie CAN be as opposed to what they typically are.

Well done]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You pretty much nailed it on most counts.<br />
I hadn&#x27;t considered the War Machine angle, but I also didn&#x27;t miss him either, so that is what it is.<br />
As for Hawkeye, does anyone REALLY believe there won&#x27;t  be a Hawkeye movie?  Make no mistake that Renner is expecting a big paycheque when his turn comes round.  I agree we aren&#x27;t that vested in the arrow thrower, but when he finally arrives on the light side, we are impressed.  Not a great redemption, but a redemption moment after a fashion.<br />
Despite it&#x27;s flaws, it will stand equally with Nolan&#x27;s Dark Knight trilogy as a benchmark of what a Comic book movie CAN be as opposed to what they typically are.</p>
<p>Well done</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Steve		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Like all of the other criticisms of The Avengers that are out there, you are just trying to hard. We don&#x27;t care about Hawkeye? You even hit the nail on the head when you said the point was to create emotional investment for Widow, and then dismissed it as not good enough. That&#x27;s what the zombifying of Hawkeye was for, and it was great. Complaining about the time spent on the in-fighting is also idiotic. What makes this this movie great is that they shouldn&#x27;t work as a team, but the come together anyway. The only criticism that is barely warranted is the one-dimensional nature of Loki. However, anyone who says you don&#x27;t need to see Thor before you watch this movie is wrong. If you saw how Thor ended, you know what you need to know about Loki. He&#x27;s not even the one calling the shots, he basically is told by The Other that he will suffer unimaginable pain if he fails. For all we know he dropped in on Thanos at the end of Thor and had to plead for his life.. and convince him that he could conquer Earth.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like all of the other criticisms of The Avengers that are out there, you are just trying to hard. We don&#x27;t care about Hawkeye? You even hit the nail on the head when you said the point was to create emotional investment for Widow, and then dismissed it as not good enough. That&#x27;s what the zombifying of Hawkeye was for, and it was great. Complaining about the time spent on the in-fighting is also idiotic. What makes this this movie great is that they shouldn&#x27;t work as a team, but the come together anyway. The only criticism that is barely warranted is the one-dimensional nature of Loki. However, anyone who says you don&#x27;t need to see Thor before you watch this movie is wrong. If you saw how Thor ended, you know what you need to know about Loki. He&#x27;s not even the one calling the shots, he basically is told by The Other that he will suffer unimaginable pain if he fails. For all we know he dropped in on Thanos at the end of Thor and had to plead for his life.. and convince him that he could conquer Earth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Adam		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118361</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Adam]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118361</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Great points.  The Avengers had GREAT action, great comedy, and great interaction between &#034;the Avengers&#034; making it a highly enjoyable movie.  What it didn&#x27;t have is a great plot. It didn&#x27;t tell  a great story. As you mentioned the opening could have played much better, and Loki&#x27;s motivation, and scheme could have been better&#x2F;clearer. Maria Hill could have been given more to do to avoid the Black Widow being the only female with more than a token amount of screen time. I disagree with you on Hawkeye, yes Jeremy Renner was wasted, but I don&#x27;t know that anybody walked out of the theater thinking I need more Hawkeye.

It will be really interesting to see what they do with the second movie.  It appears the plot will involve aliens attacking, and there&#x27;s certainly going to be some friction&#x2F;in-fighting within the group, so it will be fascinating to see what they do to differentiate it and if they can top themselves.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great points.  The Avengers had GREAT action, great comedy, and great interaction between &quot;the Avengers&quot; making it a highly enjoyable movie.  What it didn&#x27;t have is a great plot. It didn&#x27;t tell  a great story. As you mentioned the opening could have played much better, and Loki&#x27;s motivation, and scheme could have been better&#x2F;clearer. Maria Hill could have been given more to do to avoid the Black Widow being the only female with more than a token amount of screen time. I disagree with you on Hawkeye, yes Jeremy Renner was wasted, but I don&#x27;t know that anybody walked out of the theater thinking I need more Hawkeye.</p>
<p>It will be really interesting to see what they do with the second movie.  It appears the plot will involve aliens attacking, and there&#x27;s certainly going to be some friction&#x2F;in-fighting within the group, so it will be fascinating to see what they do to differentiate it and if they can top themselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: hung		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118360</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[hung]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118360</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Well..from the scene during the credits the last thing you have to worry about in Avengers 2 is a weak villain.  You&#x27;ll get all the strong personality of someone like Dark Knight&#x27;s Joker mixed with intelligence and strength beyond any of the Avengers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well..from the scene during the credits the last thing you have to worry about in Avengers 2 is a weak villain.  You&#x27;ll get all the strong personality of someone like Dark Knight&#x27;s Joker mixed with intelligence and strength beyond any of the Avengers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: dana		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118359</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[dana]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118359</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I can agree with most of these criticisms, but not about the ending being rushed. I really think they got it just right in not spending a ton of time on resolutions and concluding exposition. Too many films these days completely kill all their momentum and excitement by not being able to wrap it up quickly. But here, the audience is still on a high when the credits roll.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can agree with most of these criticisms, but not about the ending being rushed. I really think they got it just right in not spending a ton of time on resolutions and concluding exposition. Too many films these days completely kill all their momentum and excitement by not being able to wrap it up quickly. But here, the audience is still on a high when the credits roll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MovieTarget		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-20120507/#comment-118358</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MovieTarget]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 04:04:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/puny-god-what-worked-what-didnt-in-the-avengers-252224/#comment-118358</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If Manipulative Marketing Keeps Making Moneyâ¦ Why Stop Making Bad Movies?

I recently sat through over two hours of cheesy one-liners, and Iâm left wondering whether the 92% favorable rating given to The Avengers by critics on Rotten Tomatoes means theyâre all on the studioâs payroll or just didnât think critically enough. Iâm also beyond confused as to why Marvel didnât hire Jon Favreau, Kenneth Branagh, Joe Johnson or Louis Leterrier â or indeed any director with the genuine talent to tell a story. Joss Whedon has no credibility for this project, and was clearly out of his depth. What a waste â of the studioâs money, and of mine as a frequent moviegoer and shareholder. To mention nothing of the minds of Americans, which this movie will help to further dumb down into thinking that hype and CGI make a âgood storyâ despite grossing $200M+ opening weekend. But unlike other consumer products, smarter moviegoers canât âreturnâ their viewing of this movie for a refund.

Letâs begin with the script, which is appallingly low-minded. Even a fast-paced comic-book-
hero action movie can and should contain thoughtful, character-revealing dialogue (dialogue meaning more than two sentences per utterance, at least now and then!). It becomes quickly impossible to care at all about any of these once-special characters, each of whom is reduced to sheer flatness.

Nor is there any discernable armature (moral) â just a vague sense that the movie is flogging to death the platitude of how awesome America is because itâs full of rag-tag teams of really special, gifted people who are destined to save the world from some nebulous evil. The entire plot is, in fact, disconnected and rambling. On the one hand, the movie makes the sweeping assumption that every moviegoer will already know the backstory of the characters (It opens with Loki arriving and being introduced as Loki. End of introduction.) Why not set up each character (as well as the concept of S.H.I.E.L.D) in a way that ties all the prior movies together into this one? But regardless of the lack of backstory and context-setting, the plot is full of outrageously intelligence-insulting turns that are devoid of both logic and human (or superhero) authenticity. Loki plans to use the Hulk against the group â because in a convenient up-ending of logical continuity, the Hulkâs first rage in this movie will be unleashed on anyone and anything around him and be unable to distinguish his friends and enemies. The Black Widow announces that apparently, a blow to the head is sufficient to clear Lokiâs magical mind-controlling energy zaps. Loki opens a hole in the sky and randomly brings in Transformers-esque aliens to help him in his feebly articulated quest to âfree Earth from freedomâ.

Kudos to critics like A. O. Scott for telling the truth about this movie and Whedonâs failed vision for The Avengers. Just because people spend their money on something hotly anticipated doesnât mean itâs good. This movie is a crass manipulation of people to cough up money to cover the studioâs ill-spent investment, and you can keep doing this because moviegoers are not entitled to demand a refund for the waste of two hours of their life. Nor, can they take you to court over product misrepresentation through trailers that set a tone of quality that the feature film doesnât even begin to reach. Clearly, itâs time for that kind of consumer protection in the movie industry, because failing that it seems unlikely that studios will actually take responsibility for the egregious waste of resources that goes into churning out mediocre movies like The Avengers, let alone the outright duplicity of packaging it as something worthwhile and meaningful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Manipulative Marketing Keeps Making Moneyâ¦ Why Stop Making Bad Movies?</p>
<p>I recently sat through over two hours of cheesy one-liners, and Iâm left wondering whether the 92% favorable rating given to The Avengers by critics on Rotten Tomatoes means theyâre all on the studioâs payroll or just didnât think critically enough. Iâm also beyond confused as to why Marvel didnât hire Jon Favreau, Kenneth Branagh, Joe Johnson or Louis Leterrier â or indeed any director with the genuine talent to tell a story. Joss Whedon has no credibility for this project, and was clearly out of his depth. What a waste â of the studioâs money, and of mine as a frequent moviegoer and shareholder. To mention nothing of the minds of Americans, which this movie will help to further dumb down into thinking that hype and CGI make a âgood storyâ despite grossing $200M+ opening weekend. But unlike other consumer products, smarter moviegoers canât âreturnâ their viewing of this movie for a refund.</p>
<p>Letâs begin with the script, which is appallingly low-minded. Even a fast-paced comic-book-<br />
hero action movie can and should contain thoughtful, character-revealing dialogue (dialogue meaning more than two sentences per utterance, at least now and then!). It becomes quickly impossible to care at all about any of these once-special characters, each of whom is reduced to sheer flatness.</p>
<p>Nor is there any discernable armature (moral) â just a vague sense that the movie is flogging to death the platitude of how awesome America is because itâs full of rag-tag teams of really special, gifted people who are destined to save the world from some nebulous evil. The entire plot is, in fact, disconnected and rambling. On the one hand, the movie makes the sweeping assumption that every moviegoer will already know the backstory of the characters (It opens with Loki arriving and being introduced as Loki. End of introduction.) Why not set up each character (as well as the concept of S.H.I.E.L.D) in a way that ties all the prior movies together into this one? But regardless of the lack of backstory and context-setting, the plot is full of outrageously intelligence-insulting turns that are devoid of both logic and human (or superhero) authenticity. Loki plans to use the Hulk against the group â because in a convenient up-ending of logical continuity, the Hulkâs first rage in this movie will be unleashed on anyone and anything around him and be unable to distinguish his friends and enemies. The Black Widow announces that apparently, a blow to the head is sufficient to clear Lokiâs magical mind-controlling energy zaps. Loki opens a hole in the sky and randomly brings in Transformers-esque aliens to help him in his feebly articulated quest to âfree Earth from freedomâ.</p>
<p>Kudos to critics like A. O. Scott for telling the truth about this movie and Whedonâs failed vision for The Avengers. Just because people spend their money on something hotly anticipated doesnât mean itâs good. This movie is a crass manipulation of people to cough up money to cover the studioâs ill-spent investment, and you can keep doing this because moviegoers are not entitled to demand a refund for the waste of two hours of their life. Nor, can they take you to court over product misrepresentation through trailers that set a tone of quality that the feature film doesnât even begin to reach. Clearly, itâs time for that kind of consumer protection in the movie industry, because failing that it seems unlikely that studios will actually take responsibility for the egregious waste of resources that goes into churning out mediocre movies like The Avengers, let alone the outright duplicity of packaging it as something worthwhile and meaningful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
