Comments on: Oscar Winners Steve McQueen & John Ridley Reportedly Beefing Over ’12 Years A Slave’ Screenplay Credit

By: cory everett

cory everett — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:39 +0000

Looks like he and Russell have patched things up according to that video. Would love to hear more of the behind-the-scenes shit on this McQueen/Ridley thing and how Searchlight managed to keep a lid on it throughout the entire season.

By: equipmentguy

equipmentguy — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:39 +0000

Same old shit man, the Screenwriter today is bottom of the food chain. You get a Director or Producer loves the script and buys/options it and then the changes start. Tweak this, adjust that, then it goes into production and the actors start fine tuning things with the Director on set. By the end of this process everyone thinks they deserve a freaking co-writing credit. Especially when Awards season kicks in and attention starts shining on a film. This happens all the time because most Directors consider themselves Auteurs and they have brainwashed themselves about their talent and with the help of all their "yes" men and publicists it makes it real easy for them to be in denial about who really wrote the script. I have directed two of my own screenplays and you won't believe what I've been through on line changes and the "credit" they want on the final project. As the saying goes "Success has many Fathers but failure is a bastard child".

By: Demond

Demond — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

Ridley Should Just Start Directing His Own Movies To Avoid Beefing With Filmmakers.

By: marshmeli

marshmeli — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

Didn't Ridley thank McQueen at the Indie Spirits the night prior (could be wrong)? Interested to hear more about that, since during all the press for this film, McQueen seemed thankful for Ridley and work he did on it.

By: buddy

buddy — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

I've seen the 'shooting script' online, didn't read the whole thing but did notice that it's in chronological order- that is, it starts with Solomon at home with his family then goes from there. I'd be curious whether the decision to make it nonlinear with flashbacks happened before or during shooting or in the editing room, and also whether this somewhat radical change is part of the (alleged, possible) conflict between the two.

By: yer

yer — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

Director's ask for phony screenwriting credits all the time. It's part of creating the 'auteur' allure going.

By: john

john — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

Let's just be clear: McQueen needed Ridley. Ridley did not need McQueen.

By: FP

FP — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

The righteous indignation is funny. As of every one of these "screenwriters" would clap as vigorously as McQueen if they watched another writer accept an Oscar for a script they also had part in writing. Classy.

By: Crazyxcrazy

Crazyxcrazy — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

Steve McQueen's a dick, who knew?

Oh yeah EVERYBODY

By: Ardel

Ardel — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

Good God writers are so precious. Look at the script again you can see the cut and paste.

By: KT

KT — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

It amazes how much bitchassness is in this industry.

By: magbo

magbo — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

Wrong. Ridley didn't direct the movie. So we don't know what it would have turned out like had he done so. Making movies is teamwork in the end – this movie is driven first by the book (Ridley definitely 'needed' the book) then the script then the direction then the casting then the acting performances (and wrapped up with that the casting) then the editing then all of the aesthetic skills – cinematography, wardrobe etc. brought to bring it to fruition. The articles says McQueen 'had a hand in shaping the final result' (of the script). Without being in on those writing sessions we don't know what that actually means. He may well have a good claim for some kind for writing credit and the extent to which he is being an asshole depends on the strength of that claim. Clearly they disagree on the strength of that claim – but in my book if anyone contributes to script then they should get a credit but the credits should reflect the respective contributions (and that just has to be agreed). It may be that you could equate McQueen's 'hand' as 5% – if that is so then it is only right that he is acknowledged at 5% rather than not being acknowledged at all because in fact Ridley did not write the script 100% all by his self. Perhaps the system of script writing credits needs to be revisited at least to acknowledge the principal that ANY contribution is worth SOMETHING – although you'd still get disagreements over percentage value. Still, given the critical success of the movie and the huge accolades both are receiving, it's disappointing to say the least, that they didn't acknowledge each others work when they received their awards. Even 'artists' like McQueen, it seems, are not immune.

By: mike

mike — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

This actually cheers me up. If people cant find hapiness the night they win an Oscar, why would I want to be any part of that insane machine? Thank you for reminding me my boring real life is as good, or better then any of these 'superstars' as they, like the rest of us, are rarely happy with our lot in life either. The rest of us, dont, however, get showered with constant adulation. Go figure. Hence: The Human Drama.

By: spmorgan

spmorgan — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

In the first video you can see McQueen clapping while Ridley walks to the stage. It looks genuine at that point.

By: World Famous Director Supreme

World Famous Director Supreme — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

Love the film and McQueen's work but this shows insecurity and immaturity on both their parts. As is often true in these squabbles the two sides are acting both more alike than they might think. So what if you actually wrote part of the movie and didn't get credit. If the writer wants all the glory or he's going to make a stink about it, let him have it, move on and don't work with him again. The display they both put on does more to hurt them than help them.

How many people in the history of movies have sweat blood into a film and didn't get credit. This is not the first time. The test of a filmmaker as a person comes when fame approaches. Be the big man and go on to the next project.

Kudos and awesome congrats to Mr. Ridley. However nobody but nobody sees it as Ridley's movie. There are two names attached to the execution of the film McQueen and Solomon Northrup. Steve, don't spoil a good thing.

By: mark w

mark w — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

I don't remember this much fuss over the "alleged" Brad Pitt/Marc Forster feud about "World War Z" last year. That was MUCH more toxic than this silly s***. And trust me: if I told you what THAT feud was about, you'd never believe me.

By: Jason

Jason — Fri, 13 May 2016 08:00:38 +0000

Your kidding right? He forgot to mention Gale was his wife because he was obviously nervous, and people are getting worked up he forgot to mention one name? He even said afterwards that he meant to thank McQueen too. He's a screenplay writer, not an actor used to public speaking. Jesus, people are idiots.