<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Oscar Best Song Nominee &#8220;Alone Yet Not Alone&#8221; Disqualified, Category Will Remain With 4 Contenders	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/oscar-best-song-nominee-alone-yet-not-alone-disqualified-category-will-remain-with-4-contenders-20140130/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/oscar-best-song-nominee-alone-yet-not-alone-disqualified-category-will-remain-with-4-contenders-20140130/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 08:13:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: StephenM		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/oscar-best-song-nominee-alone-yet-not-alone-disqualified-category-will-remain-with-4-contenders-20140130/#comment-39621</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[StephenM]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 08:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/oscar-best-song-nominee-alone-yet-not-alone-disqualified-category-will-remain-with-4-contenders-89621/#comment-39621</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Sooo, it&#x27;s absolutely necessary to go out and make a fool of yourself campaigning for awards, going to all sorts of events and begging people to vote for you for months in order to get nominated, but it&#x27;s not okay to email anybody about it just to let people know you&#x27;re eligible?  That&#x27;s just stupid.  The song isn&#x27;t great and the movie looks lousy, but this just sounds like Hollywood smacking down a little movie for trying (and succeeding!) to get noticed in ways which don&#x27;t require a lot of money.  Shame on the academy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sooo, it&#x27;s absolutely necessary to go out and make a fool of yourself campaigning for awards, going to all sorts of events and begging people to vote for you for months in order to get nominated, but it&#x27;s not okay to email anybody about it just to let people know you&#x27;re eligible?  That&#x27;s just stupid.  The song isn&#x27;t great and the movie looks lousy, but this just sounds like Hollywood smacking down a little movie for trying (and succeeding!) to get noticed in ways which don&#x27;t require a lot of money.  Shame on the academy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rafa		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/oscar-best-song-nominee-alone-yet-not-alone-disqualified-category-will-remain-with-4-contenders-20140130/#comment-39622</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rafa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 08:13:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/oscar-best-song-nominee-alone-yet-not-alone-disqualified-category-will-remain-with-4-contenders-89621/#comment-39622</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Poor Lana Del Rey. First sabotaged with the fake Variety article, now this... too bad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Poor Lana Del Rey. First sabotaged with the fake Variety article, now this&#8230; too bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
