<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: NYFF &#8217;10 Review: &#8216;Tuesday After Christmas&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nyff-10-review-tuesday-after-christmas-20101011/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nyff-10-review-tuesday-after-christmas-20101011/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2020 02:02:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Nick		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nyff-10-review-tuesday-after-christmas-20101011/#comment-24362</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Nick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Oct 2010 20:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=600#comment-24362</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I feel like the styel of the thing (basically one 5-10 minute shot per scene) makes what would normally be a very conventional story and adds a very interesting extra dimension. The story is &#034;conventional&#034; only in the sense that it&#039;s common, and completely realistic and plausible. The long takes allow the scenes to build naturally, and there&#039;s inherent tension from the first (great) scene of the film because the audience and two characters know information that one doesn&#039;t and they&#039;re all colliding with one another. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And although it allows scenes to play out, it definitely has a point of view, and it&#039;s the choices like camera placement and which parts of these interactions we see that makes it unique and engaging. I think the last scene in the film explemplifies that perspective incredibly well. Your expectation is not what transpires, formally or plot wise, and that&#039;s a real strength.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I feel like the styel of the thing (basically one 5-10 minute shot per scene) makes what would normally be a very conventional story and adds a very interesting extra dimension. The story is &quot;conventional&quot; only in the sense that it&#39;s common, and completely realistic and plausible. The long takes allow the scenes to build naturally, and there&#39;s inherent tension from the first (great) scene of the film because the audience and two characters know information that one doesn&#39;t and they&#39;re all colliding with one another. </p>
<p>And although it allows scenes to play out, it definitely has a point of view, and it&#39;s the choices like camera placement and which parts of these interactions we see that makes it unique and engaging. I think the last scene in the film explemplifies that perspective incredibly well. Your expectation is not what transpires, formally or plot wise, and that&#39;s a real strength.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
