Comments on: Nothing To See Here: There’s Little Reason To Be Worried About ‘Django Unchained’ https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/ Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5 By: Caleb https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/#comment-78239 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-110587/#comment-78239 This article is almost entirely comprised of conjecture, with little or no substance at all. Since when did the Tarantino camp hire the Playlist to play PR? I honestly hope you're getting some kind of compensation for that opus of dismissive bullshit. Look how ridiculously presumptuous you've allowed yourself to be with someone else's work. Big balls, really.

And what's with the fanboy digs lately? Do you seriously not know what you are?

]]> By: Fred https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/#comment-78240 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-110587/#comment-78240 Call me a Tarantino fan and believer or the same of Altman, Anderson, Lean, Fellini, Kurosawa, Lean, etc….not everyone wants everything tightened and shrunk to an MTV/ADD/Film School 101/extra-showtime-a-day standard. If it's good, more is often better.

]]> By: Doctor Goodspeed https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/#comment-78241 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-110587/#comment-78241 Whoever wrote this clearly hasn't read the script too well, as Russell's role wasn't "small" it was the 4th biggest role in the entire movie, so yeah. But blending it with Goggins' Billy Crash is a good idea, and I still say they should get Jonah Hill back for Scotty

]]> By: Duddi https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/#comment-78242 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-110587/#comment-78242 Well, why not just give a ring to Val Kilmer – i'm sure he's home having snacks, and waiting for something good to come !!! 🙂

]]> By: d https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/#comment-78243 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-110587/#comment-78243 The character of Scott Harmony was crucial….
the fact that Ace Woody's character was merged with Billy Crash is another yikes point..
I wish Q.T wouldn't rush his movies…He rushed Inglorious Basterds and that movie was O.K the script was AMAZING. Looks like this is gonna be the same…

]]> By: Joe https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/#comment-78244 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-110587/#comment-78244 Wouldn't the 270-page script suggest a runtime of 4 hrs, 3o min (rather than the 2:45 you listed), going by the 1 page = 1 minute standard? Not that I would actually expect anything close to a 4-plus-hour movie, but I'm just wondering what the math is on that – how 270 pages translates to 165 minutes.

]]> By: Helgi https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/#comment-78245 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-110587/#comment-78245 I am more concerned about the editing of this overly long film – who will edit it? Tarantino´s long-time editor/friend died last year. Who will replace her?

]]> By: WRT https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/#comment-78246 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-110587/#comment-78246 You're absolutely dead wrong dismissing SBC's part as "a rather brief sub-plot" that might just as well be excised. It was an absolutely CRITICAL flashback that clued us in to where Django's wife had been since she and Django had been split up. Yes, Scotty in-and-of-himself isn't critical, and surely another actor could play him, but you can't just lose that information and have the same movie. And to trim all the "fat" from the script would be to undermine Tarantino's aesthetic: his movies are disgressive, excessive, and long. This could be a 90 min thriller, but we'd have seen it before (structurally, narratively). The fat is what will allow DU to distinguish itself, among other things — though, I suppose I agree with the specific point that the loss of one of many redneck villain types isn't the end of the world

]]> By: Sam https://staging2.theplaylist.net/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-20120511/#comment-78247 Fri, 13 May 2016 12:28:30 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/nothing-to-see-here-theres-little-reason-to-be-worried-about-django-unchained-110587/#comment-78247 if there's any bad news come along, please put another picture. I'm starting to pity Leonardo diCaprio in this..

]]>