<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Naomie Harris’s Moneypenny Goes Solo In Phone Commercial, ‘Spectre’ Is Apparently 2 Hours, 40 Minutes Long	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/naomie-harriss-moneypenny-goes-solo-in-phone-commercial-spectre-is-apparently-2-hours-40-minutes-long-20150914/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/naomie-harriss-moneypenny-goes-solo-in-phone-commercial-spectre-is-apparently-2-hours-40-minutes-long-20150914/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:14:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: JF		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/naomie-harriss-moneypenny-goes-solo-in-phone-commercial-spectre-is-apparently-2-hours-40-minutes-long-20150914/#comment-125449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JF]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 02:14:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/naomie-harriss-moneypenny-goes-solo-in-phone-commercial-spectre-is-apparently-2-hours-40-minutes-long-259916/#comment-125449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;Less a permission to kill, then, more a permission to make your arse go to sleep.&#034; Maybe the story, scope and pacing allow for the run time. Maybe it\&#039;s epic enough. I\&#039;m fine with a 2h40 Bond film. Besides, the shortest Bond film is Quantum of Solace; clearly, run time is no measurement of quality]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Less a permission to kill, then, more a permission to make your arse go to sleep.&quot; Maybe the story, scope and pacing allow for the run time. Maybe it\&#8217;s epic enough. I\&#8217;m fine with a 2h40 Bond film. Besides, the shortest Bond film is Quantum of Solace; clearly, run time is no measurement of quality</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
