Comments on: Mission IMAXible: Tom Cruise Spy Sequel To Hit Large-Format Screens Five Days Early On Dec 16th https://staging2.theplaylist.net/mission-imaxible-tom-cruise-spy-sequel-to-hit-large-format-screens-five-days-early-on-dec-16th-20110929/ Fri, 13 May 2016 13:46:00 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5 By: Metzner https://staging2.theplaylist.net/mission-imaxible-tom-cruise-spy-sequel-to-hit-large-format-screens-five-days-early-on-dec-16th-20110929/#comment-87994 Fri, 13 May 2016 13:46:00 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2011/more/uncategorized/mission-imaxible-tom-cruise-spy-sequel-to-hit-large-format-screens-five-days-early-on-dec-16th-116079/#comment-87994 Last year at the Mission: Impossible — Ghost Protocol press conference in Dubai, Tom Cruise was quoted as saying:
“One of the things I always wanted for the franchise was for it not to have a number afterwards. I’ve never done sequels to films and I never thought of these films as sequels. Paramount has done a great job in coming up with a title, so it’s not going to be MI2, 3, 4: It’s going to be Mission: Impossible Ghost Protocol.”

I think what he meant was that all of the Mission: Impossible movies are set in their own alternate reality/universe and are not sequels or connected to each other. That explains why there is no continuity between the movies and why they keep using mostly new casts. It would have been good if they had emphasised this from the second film onwards and given each film a subtitle instead of a number.

]]>