<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Michel Hazanavicius In Talks To Direct Tom Hanks, Maybe Natalie Portman In &#8216;In The Garden Of Beasts&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/michel-hazanavicius-in-talks-to-direct-tom-hanks-maybe-natalie-portman-in-in-the-garden-of-beasts-20120913/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/michel-hazanavicius-in-talks-to-direct-tom-hanks-maybe-natalie-portman-in-in-the-garden-of-beasts-20120913/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:47:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: James		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/michel-hazanavicius-in-talks-to-direct-tom-hanks-maybe-natalie-portman-in-in-the-garden-of-beasts-20120913/#comment-115986</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[James]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/michel-hazanavicius-in-talks-to-direct-tom-hanks-maybe-natalie-portman-in-in-the-garden-of-beasts-251135/#comment-115986</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#x27;ll restate what I said when the project was announced last fall. they have their work cut out for them. The book is not cinematic. 

Dodd himself does virtually nothing over the course of it except meet with Hitler once or twice. His daughter Martha is the focus of the book, and all she does is go through a succession of lovers, one of whom is a Soviet agent. We never see any espionage though, just their endless long drives in the country. The whole book also takes place over a very brief period in 1933&#x2F;1934, as the Nazis are only just beginning to rise to power. 

My problem with this pointless book can be encapsulated in one fact. Toward the beginning, Larsen mentions that Dodd rents the family mansion from a Jewish family and allows them to live on in the attic, so they&#x27;ll be protected by his diplomatic immunity. Larsen then NEVER MENTIONS THEM AGAIN in the book. 

The book is fixated on Martha&#x27;s busy lovelife to such an extent that it overlooks most everything else. Any film of this will have to be almost entirely fictional. DEVIL IN THE WHITE CITY it ain&#x27;t. (And of course even that brilliant book has proven impossible to adapt)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#x27;ll restate what I said when the project was announced last fall. they have their work cut out for them. The book is not cinematic. </p>
<p>Dodd himself does virtually nothing over the course of it except meet with Hitler once or twice. His daughter Martha is the focus of the book, and all she does is go through a succession of lovers, one of whom is a Soviet agent. We never see any espionage though, just their endless long drives in the country. The whole book also takes place over a very brief period in 1933&#x2F;1934, as the Nazis are only just beginning to rise to power. </p>
<p>My problem with this pointless book can be encapsulated in one fact. Toward the beginning, Larsen mentions that Dodd rents the family mansion from a Jewish family and allows them to live on in the attic, so they&#x27;ll be protected by his diplomatic immunity. Larsen then NEVER MENTIONS THEM AGAIN in the book. </p>
<p>The book is fixated on Martha&#x27;s busy lovelife to such an extent that it overlooks most everything else. Any film of this will have to be almost entirely fictional. DEVIL IN THE WHITE CITY it ain&#x27;t. (And of course even that brilliant book has proven impossible to adapt)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Mikky		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/michel-hazanavicius-in-talks-to-direct-tom-hanks-maybe-natalie-portman-in-in-the-garden-of-beasts-20120913/#comment-115987</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mikky]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/michel-hazanavicius-in-talks-to-direct-tom-hanks-maybe-natalie-portman-in-in-the-garden-of-beasts-251135/#comment-115987</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This movie could finally be the one putting Hanks in the spotlight again. Hazanavicius excel in making shine his actors, he really challenges them! That would be a really good post-oscar carrier choice for Natalie Portman and a very recomanded one fot Tom!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This movie could finally be the one putting Hanks in the spotlight again. Hazanavicius excel in making shine his actors, he really challenges them! That would be a really good post-oscar carrier choice for Natalie Portman and a very recomanded one fot Tom!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
