Also, I really feel bad, because it does seem we hurt your feelings in some way. Can we get you a drink? Maybe a cute new outfit? An apology of some sort? I know some people you can talk to, and if it will make you feel better, we can talk to them together.

Also, Al Gore used Keynote.

Now why don't you grow up, be a man, and admit to the long list of The Playlists' shortcomings, rather than sit in judgement of real journalists. I mean really, it's laughable that you think you and your little site adds anything of value
to film world. Your "analysis" is cribbed from other writers, as is your news-gathering, which is simply stolen from sites where real journalists actually break stories as opposed to serving as an aggregator with an immature, filmmakers-are-sell outs-if-they-don't-make-the-kind-of-films-they-want -us-to-make, arrogant and childish dictum that you guys seem to live by.

Also, this guy is the same one who keeps responding to question our grammar and spelling. Let's bring him on as an editor! I'm sure he's charming in person.

In two postings, you criticize Marketsaw for their lack of journalistic prudence, then you blame the director of "League" for forcing Connery into an early retirement!?

Even if that statement was intended to have a sort of tongue-in-cheekiness about it, it is still a wholly inaccurate one. Talk about not doing your homework. Maybe Don Simpson can help you out with that one.

And given how many errors I find in your pages on a weekly basis, and the childish, petty, and snarky rantings made by your writers about the supposed character traits of people whom they have never met (see Len Wiseman "jerk" comment below. I mean, really, you don't know him, so what's that about?) I hardly think you should be questioning the journalistic integrity of others.

Perhaps you should start with the basics like fixing all the spelling, grammar, and/or syntax errors on your site. And hiring writers who actually know how to form intelligent, thought-provoking sentences, rather than appeal to the lowest common denominator set.