Comments on: Marc Forster Compares ‘World War Z’ Reshoots To Buying A Persian Rug

By: Duddi

Duddi — Fri, 13 May 2016 10:07:37 +0000

WWZ is getting a lot of a bad buzz,before its release in June, and that's thanks to the mess that mass-media did… i found the re-shooting process to be completely normal, as the dude below has pointed out that the ending of Django Unchained was completely changed last year by Q.T. and thank god it went un-exaggerated like WWZ … my message is wait, watch the movie first … don't create a superstitious-thought without even have a single clue about it… the trailer is just 2 and some minutes long but the movie is 120 minutes long… so watch it and then have your opinion…

By: Adam Scott Thompson

Adam Scott Thompson — Fri, 13 May 2016 10:07:37 +0000

So used to seeing Forster straight on or wearing his ballcap. Dude's got a drive-in movie screen for a forehead. Anyway, the book was greatness; the film will probably do better biz overseas. Two cents and a fuck given.

By: PHILLIPS_WAS_RIGHT

PHILLIPS_WAS_RIGHT — Fri, 13 May 2016 10:07:37 +0000

I feel bad for Forster, but this looks fucking terrible. Zombies don't work when CG'd. I am Legend kind of works because the zombies are treated more like classic movie monsters where they aren't seen too much and lurk in the shadows but that's an atypical zombie film. Most zombie films have the zombies crowding the survivors the whole time and part of the appeal is that the zombies look somewhat real. The Walking Dead may have fake CG splatters when the zombies die, but at least the zombies are real people in make up. These zombies look like shit. I hope that I'm wrong and that there will be at least some people in zombie makeup and that movie will rock, but the trailers have been terrible thus far.

By: vincent

vincent — Fri, 13 May 2016 10:07:37 +0000

guess the rug really didn't tie the room together….

By: hank

hank — Fri, 13 May 2016 10:07:37 +0000

Tarantino changed the ending of Django Unchained during filming once he realized it didn't work. Why was that not as big a deal as this?

By: Gina

Gina — Fri, 13 May 2016 10:07:37 +0000

Umm, it's more like, buying a Persian rug, not liking it, and then ripping down the house to build a new one around the Persian rug. What is the budget of this movie now? 200+ million dollars? That means with marketing/distribution/promotions this movie is going to swell over 300 million dollars.
No wonder why they have it rated as a PG-13. Tweener's can be sold any bill of goods,(after all these are the ages that bought into the Twilight craze) however, they are not going to get the majority mature adults (18-25) into theater seats.

My prediction: Movie will open up to around 50 million dollars (domestic North America), and will end up dropping off, from bad word of mouth. Monsters University will beat in on the charts, and the hold over from Man of Steel, might even put this movie in opening 3rd place. World wide, it should end up in the 300 million dollar range, total. The movie will be a huge financial disaster for Paramount, Plan B Productions, and Mark Forster's career will take a nose dive after it. Pitt will skate by like usual.