<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Life&#8217; Is Cruel In New NSFW Trailer &#038; 3 Clips	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/life-cruel-new-nsfw-trailer-3-clips-20170314/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/life-cruel-new-nsfw-trailer-3-clips-20170314/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:29:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Sleuth1989		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/life-cruel-new-nsfw-trailer-3-clips-20170314/#comment-152798</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Sleuth1989]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Mar 2017 20:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=360885#comment-152798</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In defense...every Jennifer Lawrence movie is a half-baked cliche. LOL Just saying. Like every movie she&#039;s been in, the plots are predictable. And her regular director always needs to do a happy ending that he pretty much has set-up in the first 20 minutes. Not a fan of hers to begin with but just saying, if you were hoping to go to &quot;Passengers&quot;, that would be one of the few times she didn&#039;t have a great ensemble cast covering the spread, with a co-star unproven in drama, you were kidding yourself. But I don&#039;t see Sony as a great studio to begin with. Besides, admittedly, the funny &quot;21 Jump Street&quot; films, we&#039;ve gotten a &quot;Spider-Man&quot; reboot that was pathetic, a mediocre set of &quot;Men in Black&quot; sequels, and now they want to make an &quot;MIB 23&quot; that fuses those. Sony, for me, is great as a video game company and that&#039;s it. For movies, they struggle with genuine story work. I see &quot;Life&quot; and you have a well-rounded cast, the clips look solid, but I&#039;m not very hopeful about it. The upside is this script was made by the &quot;Deadpool&quot; writers and has up-and-comer Rebecca Ferguson who carries herself with some genuine concern and focus in all her films. But the concept looks like &quot;Alien&quot;. I&#039;m not sure how you can do &quot;Evolving alien on a space station&quot; differently but we&#039;ll see.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In defense&#8230;every Jennifer Lawrence movie is a half-baked cliche. LOL Just saying. Like every movie she&#8217;s been in, the plots are predictable. And her regular director always needs to do a happy ending that he pretty much has set-up in the first 20 minutes. Not a fan of hers to begin with but just saying, if you were hoping to go to &#8220;Passengers&#8221;, that would be one of the few times she didn&#8217;t have a great ensemble cast covering the spread, with a co-star unproven in drama, you were kidding yourself. But I don&#8217;t see Sony as a great studio to begin with. Besides, admittedly, the funny &#8220;21 Jump Street&#8221; films, we&#8217;ve gotten a &#8220;Spider-Man&#8221; reboot that was pathetic, a mediocre set of &#8220;Men in Black&#8221; sequels, and now they want to make an &#8220;MIB 23&#8221; that fuses those. Sony, for me, is great as a video game company and that&#8217;s it. For movies, they struggle with genuine story work. I see &#8220;Life&#8221; and you have a well-rounded cast, the clips look solid, but I&#8217;m not very hopeful about it. The upside is this script was made by the &#8220;Deadpool&#8221; writers and has up-and-comer Rebecca Ferguson who carries herself with some genuine concern and focus in all her films. But the concept looks like &#8220;Alien&#8221;. I&#8217;m not sure how you can do &#8220;Evolving alien on a space station&#8221; differently but we&#8217;ll see.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
