Can’t wait to see this movie.

*looks at comment*

*looks at commenter’s name*

Yes, because we should take your ignorant-ass comment seriously. Go shovel my snow, you loser.

Because the shape and form of a movie evolves from screenplay to final cut. What may have appealed to an actor during a script or story development phase might not even exist in the project’s final form. I do agree though, that any legal-age adult should have enough sense to say ‘no’ when approached to do a Lars von Trier film.

Because it’s her job?

Why do you feel sorry for them? They’re adults. They made their choices.

TLDR: A feminist was pissed off that a film about a serial-killer directed by Lars Von Trier just happened to be *a film about a serial killer directed by Lars Von Trier*. Seriously, what in the FUCK did you expect? A director who lives to anger people and push people’s buttons has NO INTENTION of pleasing audiences like yourself.

Your P.S. speaks more about yourself than it does about “filmbrodudes”. I, a woman, plan on seeing this film and unsubscribing from this website if shallow reviews like this keep getting posted.

Really? No mention of the cinematography, the score, and hardly anything of the writing, or actor’s performances. Nothing of what the film might be trying to say (in fact, the opposite, the review just dismisses anything it might have to say outright as being unimportant because of the content)

It was paragraph after paragraph of describing the film and how the reviewer found it offensive. Then we got a personal attack on von Trier and what he has made, followed by paragraphs of the “reviewer” deriding anyone who might want to actually see the film or who will find merit in it.

The only reason this review gave you to stay the hell away is one person found the content disgusting and offensive and decided to write about it on the internet. It said almost nothing of the film itself and how it was crafted.

I think pre-emptive arrest at the box office would be fair.

Never said they were ‘warriors’, weirdo. Just said I was grateful that they did a job that I wouldn’t want to.

Excuse me?

Yes, what brave warriors they are.

excellent comment and well stated. Completely agree.

what a brave whistleblower you are

At first I was sceptical of your views, but by the end I respected your opinion.

As I say, just a shame you didn’t have a little more courage in your convinctions…

Along comes ‘artist’ Von Trier, who also hates women. But that’s OK. His actors, the studio, the system and our culture supports him. They become his enablers.

He’s now free to abuse, torture and kill women through his lense because that’s what he wants to see.

Just as a hypothetical movie might be designed to satiate white supremacists by providing the ridicule, torture and murder of black people (racist murder porn), The House That Jack Built serves misogynistic murder porn. The usual spineless get out clauses are the same in both examples: “It’s not racist, it’s portraying the full horror of racism”… “It’s not misogynistic, it’s portraying the full horror of misogyny” etc, etc.

After reading articles about Uma Thurman accusing Hollywood of misogyny, I can’t help but think ‘hypocrite’ in big flashing letters. All those who participated in this movie are culpable. If this movie inspires copy cat murders in the world, they are culpable.

The most depressing thing about this movie is realising who built it. It wasn’t built by one person, it is ‘The House That Misogyny And The Patriarchy Built’.

But hey, it was directed by a female filmmaker, so she gets a pass. This critic’s political agenda allows it.

Looks like something from the Imdb board. The reviewer is clearly unable to make the distinction between “good vs bad” & “Like vs dislike”