<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Kristin Scott Thomas Gets Her Own &#8216;Only God Forgives&#8217; Poster, Rating In France Sets Off Political Battle	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/kristin-scott-thomas-gets-her-own-only-god-forgives-poster-rating-in-france-sets-off-political-battle-20130607/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/kristin-scott-thomas-gets-her-own-only-god-forgives-poster-rating-in-france-sets-off-political-battle-20130607/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:45:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arch		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/kristin-scott-thomas-gets-her-own-only-god-forgives-poster-rating-in-france-sets-off-political-battle-20130607/#comment-52965</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/kristin-scott-thomas-gets-her-own-only-god-forgives-poster-rating-in-france-sets-off-political-battle-97216/#comment-52965</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If I remember correctly the (-16) classification does not lead to any distribution limitation (i-e every theater can carry it). The (-18) does though (but is very rarely used). Again IIRC.

Also Royal actually used the word &#034;pollute&#034; and not &#034;contaminate&#034;. Not that different I guess. (Also for the record Royal as been following this &#034;line of thought&#034; for years, since the 80&#x27;s, back when she was opposed to the diffusion of many Japanese anime series].

Finally it seems the minister didn&#x27;t change the rating. According to the AFP news they asked &#034;for a second viewing by the comity, as allowed by a decree, and following a request from the producers&#034;. They debated and then settled for a (-12) rating.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If I remember correctly the (-16) classification does not lead to any distribution limitation (i-e every theater can carry it). The (-18) does though (but is very rarely used). Again IIRC.</p>
<p>Also Royal actually used the word &quot;pollute&quot; and not &quot;contaminate&quot;. Not that different I guess. (Also for the record Royal as been following this &quot;line of thought&quot; for years, since the 80&#x27;s, back when she was opposed to the diffusion of many Japanese anime series].</p>
<p>Finally it seems the minister didn&#x27;t change the rating. According to the AFP news they asked &quot;for a second viewing by the comity, as allowed by a decree, and following a request from the producers&quot;. They debated and then settled for a (-12) rating.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
