<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Ken Jeong Gets Expanded Role In &#8216;The Hangover Part 3,&#8217; But Will It Make For A Better Finale?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-20120713/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-20120713/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:03:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jozzy		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-20120713/#comment-74317</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jozzy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-108499/#comment-74317</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Hangover 1 and 2 are awesome movies, both movies kept me and my friends very entertained and laughing all the way through. Love that they kept number 2 so similar to number 1. &#034;You don&#x27;t Fix what ain&#x27;t broken&#034; and if you do you wind up like most Rock groups that want to &#034;change their sound&#034; Can&#x27;t Wait for number 3 will be seeing that in theaters for sure.  LONG LIVE  MR. CHOU]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hangover 1 and 2 are awesome movies, both movies kept me and my friends very entertained and laughing all the way through. Love that they kept number 2 so similar to number 1. &quot;You don&#x27;t Fix what ain&#x27;t broken&quot; and if you do you wind up like most Rock groups that want to &quot;change their sound&quot; Can&#x27;t Wait for number 3 will be seeing that in theaters for sure.  LONG LIVE  MR. CHOU</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rick		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-20120713/#comment-74318</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-108499/#comment-74318</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I also saw the &#034;retread&#034; of the formula in Hangover II, but, I was thoroughly entertained in spite of that. The situations they found themselves in were more extreme than in the first movie (loss of a finger, poor Stu&#x27;s experience with the Bangkok stripper, etc) and it worked for me. I loved it! I do agree tho that a third outing under the same formula would be stretching it. However, if you don&#x27;t think that reusing the same formula ever works, consider the James Bond movies. They only make slight changes every few years and they have drawn enough box office results to be in business for 50 years!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also saw the &quot;retread&quot; of the formula in Hangover II, but, I was thoroughly entertained in spite of that. The situations they found themselves in were more extreme than in the first movie (loss of a finger, poor Stu&#x27;s experience with the Bangkok stripper, etc) and it worked for me. I loved it! I do agree tho that a third outing under the same formula would be stretching it. However, if you don&#x27;t think that reusing the same formula ever works, consider the James Bond movies. They only make slight changes every few years and they have drawn enough box office results to be in business for 50 years!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Responding To Alan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-20120713/#comment-74319</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Responding To Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-108499/#comment-74319</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Re Alan: How does the timeline negate ANYTHING in the article? The rushed timeline may have contributed to the uninspired &#038; mean spirited retread, but it WAS one nonetheless. Excuses don&#x27;t make the article any less true or the sequal any better (it was awful).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re Alan: How does the timeline negate ANYTHING in the article? The rushed timeline may have contributed to the uninspired &amp; mean spirited retread, but it WAS one nonetheless. Excuses don&#x27;t make the article any less true or the sequal any better (it was awful).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-20120713/#comment-74320</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-108499/#comment-74320</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This article is seriously misinformed. The reason for the disappointment of &#x27;Hangover II&#x27; is because THERE WAS NO FREAKIN&#x27; TIME TO MAKE THE FILM. Phillips went to work on &#x27;Due Date&#x27;, working on the film for release a year later. And then he had to do &#x27;Hangover II&#x27;, which he had to complete in less than another year. So it makes sense: Phillips didn&#x27;t have time to re-develop the story.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is seriously misinformed. The reason for the disappointment of &#x27;Hangover II&#x27; is because THERE WAS NO FREAKIN&#x27; TIME TO MAKE THE FILM. Phillips went to work on &#x27;Due Date&#x27;, working on the film for release a year later. And then he had to do &#x27;Hangover II&#x27;, which he had to complete in less than another year. So it makes sense: Phillips didn&#x27;t have time to re-develop the story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-20120713/#comment-74321</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/ken-jeong-gets-expanded-role-in-the-hangover-part-3-but-will-it-make-for-a-better-finale-108499/#comment-74321</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I loved Hangover I. I wish I had never seen Hangover II because it&#x27;s essentially the same damn movie. Unless it gets stellar reviews, I probably won&#x27;t be checking out III at all.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved Hangover I. I wish I had never seen Hangover II because it&#x27;s essentially the same damn movie. Unless it gets stellar reviews, I probably won&#x27;t be checking out III at all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
