<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Joss Whedon&#8217;s &#8220;Cabin in the Woods&#8221; Bumped a Year (To Add 3D?)	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/joss-whedons-cabin-in-woods-bumped-year-20091010/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/joss-whedons-cabin-in-woods-bumped-year-20091010/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2020 17:02:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/joss-whedons-cabin-in-woods-bumped-year-20091010/#comment-11466</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:15:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=5935#comment-11466</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Having read the script, I would have to say &#034;Cabin in the Woods&#034; is a very odd beast.  Without giving anything away, I would say it struck me as a better concept for a video game than a movie.  In fact, if you told me that the movie was nothing more than a 90 minute trojan horse brand introduction for a new gaming franchise,  I would not be surprised. I think that may be where the real money is in all of this.  The draft I read really doesn&#039;t have a lot of sequel potential.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;So if you view the movie as nothing more than a revenue neutral commercial for a much larger enterprise, 3D could make sense if it is relatively cheap and helps create &#034;event&#034; buzz around the brand.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read the script, I would have to say &quot;Cabin in the Woods&quot; is a very odd beast.  Without giving anything away, I would say it struck me as a better concept for a video game than a movie.  In fact, if you told me that the movie was nothing more than a 90 minute trojan horse brand introduction for a new gaming franchise,  I would not be surprised. I think that may be where the real money is in all of this.  The draft I read really doesn&#39;t have a lot of sequel potential.</p>
<p>So if you view the movie as nothing more than a revenue neutral commercial for a much larger enterprise, 3D could make sense if it is relatively cheap and helps create &quot;event&quot; buzz around the brand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rodrigoperez		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/joss-whedons-cabin-in-woods-bumped-year-20091010/#comment-11449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodrigoperez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=5935#comment-11449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Joss Whedon is so fucking painfully overrated. Loved by pop culturalists or the movie/TV equivalents of Stereogum = MOR]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joss Whedon is so fucking painfully overrated. Loved by pop culturalists or the movie/TV equivalents of Stereogum = MOR</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: SK		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/joss-whedons-cabin-in-woods-bumped-year-20091010/#comment-11447</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[SK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:42:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=5935#comment-11447</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really don&#039;t think the 30% extra cost for a single 3D ticket will end up being that much of a box office boost either given the extra cost adding 3D presumably requires (how much more exactly does adding some 3D cost?).  If 3D is pretty cheap to add then it&#039;s interesting.&lt;br /&gt;&#034;The Final Destination 3D&#034; cost $40million and brought in $65.6mil domestically plus another $85.7mil abroad ($151 mil total).  That&#039;s pretty good I guess.  &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And the 3D additions seemed like a decent novelty for FD-3D on the way to becoming a craze, but when I see the $14 dollar ticket compared to $10, I&#039;m out and will see something else.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I wonder if the number of cheaper regular price tickets sold would have been greater for Final Destination than the $14 3D tickets.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Domestic B.O.:&lt;br /&gt;Final Destination 1 (2000) &lt;br /&gt;- $53mil on $23 budget&lt;br /&gt;Final Destination 2 (2003) &lt;br /&gt;- $47mil on NA budget&lt;br /&gt;Final Destination 3 (2006) &lt;br /&gt;- $54mil on $23 budget&lt;br /&gt;Final Destination 3 (2009) &lt;br /&gt;- $65mil on $40 budget&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Worldwide Total:&lt;br /&gt;FD1 = $113&lt;br /&gt;FD2 = $90&lt;br /&gt;FD3 = $113&lt;br /&gt;FD4 = $151&lt;br /&gt;I&#039;m sure the marketing costs haven&#039;t gotten cheaper over the last 9 years either.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I can&#039;t wait until this fad drops.  Maybe the higher priced tickets even take away from concession sales at the theaters?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really don&#39;t think the 30% extra cost for a single 3D ticket will end up being that much of a box office boost either given the extra cost adding 3D presumably requires (how much more exactly does adding some 3D cost?).  If 3D is pretty cheap to add then it&#39;s interesting.<br />&quot;The Final Destination 3D&quot; cost $40million and brought in $65.6mil domestically plus another $85.7mil abroad ($151 mil total).  That&#39;s pretty good I guess.  </p>
<p>And the 3D additions seemed like a decent novelty for FD-3D on the way to becoming a craze, but when I see the $14 dollar ticket compared to $10, I&#39;m out and will see something else.</p>
<p>I wonder if the number of cheaper regular price tickets sold would have been greater for Final Destination than the $14 3D tickets.</p>
<p>Domestic B.O.:<br />Final Destination 1 (2000) <br />&#8211; $53mil on $23 budget<br />Final Destination 2 (2003) <br />&#8211; $47mil on NA budget<br />Final Destination 3 (2006) <br />&#8211; $54mil on $23 budget<br />Final Destination 3 (2009) <br />&#8211; $65mil on $40 budget</p>
<p>Worldwide Total:<br />FD1 = $113<br />FD2 = $90<br />FD3 = $113<br />FD4 = $151<br />I&#39;m sure the marketing costs haven&#39;t gotten cheaper over the last 9 years either.</p>
<p>I can&#39;t wait until this fad drops.  Maybe the higher priced tickets even take away from concession sales at the theaters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
