<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Joss Whedon Says &#8216;Lucy&#8217; Is &#8220;A Huge Step&#8221; In Advancing Female-Driven Blockbusters	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/joss-whedon-says-lucy-is-a-huge-step-in-advancing-female-driven-blockbusters-20150130/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/joss-whedon-says-lucy-is-a-huge-step-in-advancing-female-driven-blockbusters-20150130/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 30 Mar 2017 16:41:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Emperor Zerg Rush		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/joss-whedon-says-lucy-is-a-huge-step-in-advancing-female-driven-blockbusters-20150130/#comment-136677</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emperor Zerg Rush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/joss-whedon-says-lucy-is-a-huge-step-in-advancing-female-driven-blockbusters-267626/#comment-136677</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[All of this is a bit funny, since Whedon inadvertently stepped into his own mess when he was trying to take the whole GamerGate brigade to task and this in turn shone a light on the fact that most of the female characters he\&#039;s &#034;developed&#034; have been radically weak in terms of portrayal, with rare exceptions. All of this talkjobbing he\&#039;s doing could be shifted into him actually DOING something with a strong female presence.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All of this is a bit funny, since Whedon inadvertently stepped into his own mess when he was trying to take the whole GamerGate brigade to task and this in turn shone a light on the fact that most of the female characters he\&#8217;s &quot;developed&quot; have been radically weak in terms of portrayal, with rare exceptions. All of this talkjobbing he\&#8217;s doing could be shifted into him actually DOING something with a strong female presence.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: simon		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/joss-whedon-says-lucy-is-a-huge-step-in-advancing-female-driven-blockbusters-20150130/#comment-136678</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[simon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/joss-whedon-says-lucy-is-a-huge-step-in-advancing-female-driven-blockbusters-267626/#comment-136678</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Yeah i\&#039;s great that Lucy had a female lead and made money. But was it actually any good? I have a pretty high tolerance for Besson\&#039;s brand of b-movie aesthetic but that was pretty bad. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah i\&#8217;s great that Lucy had a female lead and made money. But was it actually any good? I have a pretty high tolerance for Besson\&#8217;s brand of b-movie aesthetic but that was pretty bad. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
