<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Jim Jarmusch Explains Why &#8220;The Auteur Thing Is Nonsense&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jim-jarmusch-explains-auteur-thing-nonsense-20161228/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jim-jarmusch-explains-auteur-thing-nonsense-20161228/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 01:21:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Edgar Soberón Torchia		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jim-jarmusch-explains-auteur-thing-nonsense-20161228/#comment-151618</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Edgar Soberón Torchia]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 01:21:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=355556#comment-151618</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[As I see it, the “auteur” theory is a tool we use when writing film criticism, or when we do research of certain films and directors, not as a working method for filmmakers. I do not agree with Jarmusch in this sense. Being an auteur is not the opposite of working collectively in a film.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I see it, the “auteur” theory is a tool we use when writing film criticism, or when we do research of certain films and directors, not as a working method for filmmakers. I do not agree with Jarmusch in this sense. Being an auteur is not the opposite of working collectively in a film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
