<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Jeremy Renner Say Hawkeye Is A Utility Player, Doesn&#8217;t Necessarily Need His Own Movie, But Could Join &#8216;Captain America 3&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jeremy-renner-say-hawkeye-is-a-utility-player-doesnt-necessarily-need-his-own-movie-but-could-join-captain-america-3-20140924/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jeremy-renner-say-hawkeye-is-a-utility-player-doesnt-necessarily-need-his-own-movie-but-could-join-captain-america-3-20140924/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 05:25:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Emperor Zerg Rush		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jeremy-renner-say-hawkeye-is-a-utility-player-doesnt-necessarily-need-his-own-movie-but-could-join-captain-america-3-20140924/#comment-143411</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emperor Zerg Rush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 05:25:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/jeremy-renner-say-hawkeye-is-a-utility-player-doesnt-necessarily-need-his-own-movie-but-could-join-captain-america-3-271954/#comment-143411</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In not so many words, it\&#039;s kinda like Renner\&#039;s saying &#034;as long as the checks clear, I\&#039;m fine being background&#034;. And by the way he mentioned it, I\&#039;m guessing they upped the sum of those checks significantly just not enough for him to go back on his word as if things never happened. Anyway, a Hawkeye solo film doesn\&#039;t need to happen now, or ever at all for that matter. Hawkeye\&#039;s a great character... on the page. But putting him in his own film is just repeating the same crap with Daredevil (except no one will be able to blame Affleck left and right) and everyone will recall the film as being a bland blip on the radar that &#034;had potential to be cool but sucked so hard&#034;.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In not so many words, it\&#8217;s kinda like Renner\&#8217;s saying &quot;as long as the checks clear, I\&#8217;m fine being background&quot;. And by the way he mentioned it, I\&#8217;m guessing they upped the sum of those checks significantly just not enough for him to go back on his word as if things never happened. Anyway, a Hawkeye solo film doesn\&#8217;t need to happen now, or ever at all for that matter. Hawkeye\&#8217;s a great character&#8230; on the page. But putting him in his own film is just repeating the same crap with Daredevil (except no one will be able to blame Affleck left and right) and everyone will recall the film as being a bland blip on the radar that &quot;had potential to be cool but sucked so hard&quot;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
