Comments on: Jennifer Lawrence’s $20 Million Salary Is About 20% Of The Budget For ‘Passengers’ With Chris Pratt

By: mike

mike — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

You don\’t have to have Jennifer Lawrence. If you don\’t want to pay the 20 million than get a smaller actress…The movie won\’t be the same but it will be cheaper to make. Jennifer Lawrence deserves it and she is right to leave them the final choice. That\’s how you do it. You want me? 20 million or bye.

By: Mark

Mark — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

These are just rumors to enhance the career of Jennifer, like they did with the Scarlet to the sequence of The Avengers, she is not an actress worth a salary like that.

By: Josh king

Josh king — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

You guys are indirectly reporting on content that was stolen from Sony. This is disappointing.

By: Emma

Emma — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

JLaw worth $20M salary. If Depp with all his flops has more than $20M so Lawrence with Hunger Games, Silver Linings, American Hustle X Men. Also an Oscarwin and 3 Nom, 2 Golden Globes, 1 Bafta, 2 Sag

By: faulkner

faulkner — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

are you wage-shaming Jennifer Lawrence? finally another woman gets the big bucks and instead of congratulating her, you guys point out that it\’s more than her coworkers earn? yeah, Playlist scumbags strike again.

By: Mat

Mat — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

Sounds fair if you think how much money Jennifer Lawrence brings …

By: Athena

Athena — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

@Mark: Jennifer Lawrence is definitely worth it…THG, XMen, SLP, AH…1.2 billion in revenue, countless awards including Oscar moms,one win…aanother likely for JOY.

Yeah…pay Jennifer Lawrence what she was originally promised because she is worth it and because I will pay the price of a ticket to watch Jennifer Lawrence and Chris Pratt…not Chris Pratt and someone else.

By: shana

shana — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

As messed up as that is, when you really think about it, I\’m sort of glad it\’s a woman who\’s at the top of the pay range here.

By: Stergios

Stergios — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

If there\’s one actress at the moment totally worth such a salary, then it\’s surely Jennifer Lawrence. I couldn\’t possibly agree more with Athena, I\’d watch the film for her and Chris Pratt not Pratt and someone else.

By: luke

luke — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:34 +0000

Wow, I think you need to be a bit more venerable to command that salary, she\’s a bit overrated, but prolly deserving in global bankablitliy. I just don\’t get it or her, I finder her affable but not an acting heavyweight.

By: N

Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

Did The Playlist report on THAT?

By: N

Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

So the f what? It\’s about time another woman joined the ranks of Jolie & Sandie. She\’s a global superstar. #EqualPay

By: N

Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

Mortdecai budget: $60 mil
Depp salary: $20 mil

By: Vino

Vino — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

Jolie-Depp had whammy bomb in Sony\’s The Tourist…based on terrif French thriller.

By: Tina

Tina — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

I don\’t see why it is such a problem. I don\’t understand why they won\’t pay her $20mil and still not letting her go. That just proves that they desperately want her in the movie. And if Sandra Bullock can get 20, why can\’t she? If it\’s too much money, how come no one ever complain about Leo getting paid $25mil? Is this because she\’s a woman? Idk. But I\’m on J-Law\’s side. If they want her in the movie, pay her that much. If they don\’t, then drop her. As simple as that. But good luck Sony.

By: So_obvious

So_obvious — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

Sorry, Mark, Jennifer doesn\’t need fake rumors to inflate her value. She\’s a star in TWO franchises already, an Oscar winner and 3 time nominee. She\’s worth every penny. She doesn\’t employ a full time PR team to plant pics of her going for coffee on a daily basis to try and make her seem relevant. She\’s arguably the most talented actress of her generation and she has all the awards, respect, and reviews to prove it.

By: LA2000

LA2000 — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

Chris Pratt needs a new agent. His deal should have given him financial parity with Lawrence provided that "Jurassic World" opened above a certain figure. This guy has new "Harrison Ford" written all over him and his current representation is apparently determined to sell him short.

By: Benjamin

Benjamin — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

Actually no one deserves to make that much money.

By: faulkner

faulkner — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

in a free market system, it\’s all supply and demand, Benjamin. her films earn money, she\’s in high demand. hence, her new salary. deserves has nothing to do with it. she has earned her money.

By: Jeff

Jeff — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

Lawrence has earned her salary, and has proven her worth in both auteur-driven award season fare and franchise blockbusters. The real question is why they\’re given Morten Tyldum, a director with no discernible style, personality, or even talent (was there a blander, more formulaic bit of claptrap released last year?) $3 million. They could have got a talented young director with a point of view and an eye for composition for a third of that price.

By: Hayes

Hayes — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

Morten Tyldum is a fantastic director. He should have won more awards for TIG. Chris Pratt is not in Jennifer\’s league, no way does he deserve parity with her salary. And I\’d rather see Jennifer get the big bucks than the CEO of Dow Chemical. She earns every penny she gets.

By: Brandon

Brandon — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

There is only one actor I would be happy to pay $20 million for.

By: talia

talia — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

$20 million is a bit much for a film that there is no guarantee that it will make back its budget. I think Jennifer needs a bigger track record of a film being a box office hit where she is the primary focus of the film(not the lead in a film adaptation of a book).

That said, I think any actor/actresses should be paid a salary based on how big their role is in the film

By: talia

talia — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

*Jennifer needs a more proven track record as a box office hit where she is the sole lead(Hunger Games doesn\’t count as its a film adaptation of a book that would of been a box office hit regardless of who had the lead role)

By: orsonsecondcoming

orsonsecondcoming — Mon, 23 May 2016 03:31:33 +0000

Hello, Josh King. This is a website for movie news. Where that info came from is of no concern to you or any reader. If you don\’t news about film then dont come here