<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Jeff Nichols Says &#8216;Midnight Special&#8217; Is His &#8220;Least Well-Executed&#8221; Film	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jeff-nichols-says-midnight-special-least-well-executed-film-20170726/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jeff-nichols-says-midnight-special-least-well-executed-film-20170726/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:26:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Rodrigo Paroni		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jeff-nichols-says-midnight-special-least-well-executed-film-20170726/#comment-154976</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rodrigo Paroni]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Jul 2017 00:26:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=370130#comment-154976</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really liked &quot;Midnight Special&quot;, an intelligent and unusual sci-fi movie with a chase/adventure-like style
It&#039;s a &quot;minor&quot; Nichols? Probably, but is a very good one]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really liked &#8220;Midnight Special&#8221;, an intelligent and unusual sci-fi movie with a chase/adventure-like style<br />
It&#8217;s a &#8220;minor&#8221; Nichols? Probably, but is a very good one</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benedict		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jeff-nichols-says-midnight-special-least-well-executed-film-20170726/#comment-154961</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benedict]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2017 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=370130#comment-154961</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Funny that he is self-analysing that film more than Loving, which I personally think is his weakest (or at least his quietest) effort to date - I wanted to love it, but felt it was a bit shy and didn&#039;t hit the right notes often enough. I&#039;m a huge fan of Nichols in general though, and especially of Take Shelter, Mud and Midnight Special, which are three of the most impressive American films I&#039;ve seen the last decade (Shotgun Stories also has its moments, and is a very strong debut).

Anyway yeah, Midnight Special was beautifully assembled and honestly one of the most overlooked films to come out in 2016. I can&#039;t really think how Nichols could&#039;ve been improved whilst still maintaining his integrity - in other words, if the studio had taken over it would&#039;ve been a glossy blockbuster. Maybe making WB more money, sure, but it&#039;d be quickly forgotten. This is one recent sci-fi that really deserves to be remembered in the ensuing years.

In fact, I actually had it in my #1 spot last year: https://letterboxd.com/rapta/list/fifty-2016-edition/]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Funny that he is self-analysing that film more than Loving, which I personally think is his weakest (or at least his quietest) effort to date &#8211; I wanted to love it, but felt it was a bit shy and didn&#8217;t hit the right notes often enough. I&#8217;m a huge fan of Nichols in general though, and especially of Take Shelter, Mud and Midnight Special, which are three of the most impressive American films I&#8217;ve seen the last decade (Shotgun Stories also has its moments, and is a very strong debut).</p>
<p>Anyway yeah, Midnight Special was beautifully assembled and honestly one of the most overlooked films to come out in 2016. I can&#8217;t really think how Nichols could&#8217;ve been improved whilst still maintaining his integrity &#8211; in other words, if the studio had taken over it would&#8217;ve been a glossy blockbuster. Maybe making WB more money, sure, but it&#8217;d be quickly forgotten. This is one recent sci-fi that really deserves to be remembered in the ensuing years.</p>
<p>In fact, I actually had it in my #1 spot last year: <a href="https://letterboxd.com/rapta/list/fifty-2016-edition/" rel="nofollow ugc">https://letterboxd.com/rapta/list/fifty-2016-edition/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
