Comments on: Jean Luc-Godard’s ‘Goodbye To Language 3D’ Currently Shooting, Will Have A Talking Dog Or Something

By: Phil

Phil — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:11 +0000

I second the first, second, third and fourth most recent comments.

You clearly haven't seen Film Socialisme, so your imagined opinion of the film has no place in this "article." It only further discredits you as a Critic or Journalist or whatever it is you think you are.

By: Tribeca Mike

Tribeca Mike — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:11 +0000

I thought much of the photography of Film socialisme was quite crisp and clear. Wish I could say the same about the rest of that inane film.

By: MDL

MDL — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:11 +0000

Your swipe at Film Socialisme is inaccurate. It only had a 'washed out, blurry and kind of nauseating cellphone style footage' in the movie's first third. And it was only on some shots – not all. The reason was because Godard gave a bunch of cameras [from cell phone to more high-end models] to people on the ship and had them shoot whatever they wanted to, which he then edited into the narrative. But many shots in that first third were also beautiful, still HD shots. The other two-thirds of the movie also featured the HD.

By: Tony

Tony — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:11 +0000

This is a horribly written article.

By: d

Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:11 +0000

"2010's 'Film Socialisme,' wasn't met with the warmest of receptions." Mainstream critics in general panned it, but basically everyone who appreciates Godard's late work considers it a masterpiece. I'm excited about this one, and you can again expect hostility from the same crowd.

By: Huffy

Huffy — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:11 +0000

Haven't liked Godard since he decided he hated film but you can't deny that he's always interesting. If anything It'll be interesting to see what his take on 3D is. I have yet to see a 3D movie that would have been lesser without the technology, even Hugo, but who knows. It's still very new technology; as much as I want to be a curmudgeon like Ebert and say fuck it there may be auteur out there who can take the technology and integrate it into their aesthetic in unprecedented ways.

By: PNAP

PNAP — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:10 +0000

Funny "article"

By: Phil

Phil — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:10 +0000

I second the first, second, third and fourth most recent comments.

By: Phil

Phil — Fri, 13 May 2016 12:30:10 +0000

I second the first, second, third and fourth most recent comments.