<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: James Gunn Says Marvel Thinks His Story For &#8216;Guardians Of The Galaxy 2&#8217; Is &#8220;Risky&#8221;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/james-gunn-says-marvel-thinks-his-story-for-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-is-risky-20150211/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/james-gunn-says-marvel-thinks-his-story-for-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-is-risky-20150211/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:13:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jim		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/james-gunn-says-marvel-thinks-his-story-for-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-is-risky-20150211/#comment-136098</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jim]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/james-gunn-says-marvel-thinks-his-story-for-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-is-risky-267244/#comment-136098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So their response was &#034;that\&#039;s risky, but okay&#034;.  Why are you only focusing on the first part of that quote and ignoring the second part?  Doesn\&#039;t sound like they even attempted to deter him at all. Plus, he was just pitching an idea....not like he had a treatment or script or anything like that to consider. This is s complete non-story. And what basis is there for saying that Marvel is getting more risk averse?  The two most recent movies were their riskiest yet. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So their response was &quot;that\&#8217;s risky, but okay&quot;.  Why are you only focusing on the first part of that quote and ignoring the second part?  Doesn\&#8217;t sound like they even attempted to deter him at all. Plus, he was just pitching an idea&#8230;.not like he had a treatment or script or anything like that to consider. This is s complete non-story. And what basis is there for saying that Marvel is getting more risk averse?  The two most recent movies were their riskiest yet. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Jason		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/james-gunn-says-marvel-thinks-his-story-for-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-is-risky-20150211/#comment-136099</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:13:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/james-gunn-says-marvel-thinks-his-story-for-guardians-of-the-galaxy-2-is-risky-267244/#comment-136099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Ehh, this might be true but I wouldn\&#039;t surprised if Marvel was telling Gunn these things to say to the press. The first Guardians movie was totally sold on it being Marvel\&#039;s &#034;risky&#034; movie. I think that\&#039;s the adjective everyone used. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ehh, this might be true but I wouldn\&#8217;t surprised if Marvel was telling Gunn these things to say to the press. The first Guardians movie was totally sold on it being Marvel\&#8217;s &quot;risky&quot; movie. I think that\&#8217;s the adjective everyone used. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
