<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Jackie Chan Says He&#8217;ll Be In &#8216;The Expendables 3,&#8217; But Only If It&#8217;s A Major Role	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jackie-chan-says-hell-be-in-the-expendables-3-but-only-if-its-a-major-role-20121217/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jackie-chan-says-hell-be-in-the-expendables-3-but-only-if-its-a-major-role-20121217/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:32:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: The Fanciful Norwegian		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/jackie-chan-says-hell-be-in-the-expendables-3-but-only-if-its-a-major-role-20121217/#comment-113906</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Fanciful Norwegian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:32:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/jackie-chan-says-hell-be-in-the-expendables-3-but-only-if-its-a-major-role-250202/#comment-113906</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[...and what better way to shed his old image than by doing sequels to his old movies (CZ12, Police Story 2013)? And a new Hollywood buddy flick that&#x27;s apparently so similar to his old Hollywood buddy flicks that it may as well be Rush Hour 4. We&#x27;ve heard this song before.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;and what better way to shed his old image than by doing sequels to his old movies (CZ12, Police Story 2013)? And a new Hollywood buddy flick that&#x27;s apparently so similar to his old Hollywood buddy flicks that it may as well be Rush Hour 4. We&#x27;ve heard this song before.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
