<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Is &#8216;The Reader&#8217; Too Subtle For Its Own Good?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/is-reader-too-subtle-for-its-own-good-20081202/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/is-reader-too-subtle-for-its-own-good-20081202/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2020 01:00:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rodrigoperez		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/is-reader-too-subtle-for-its-own-good-20081202/#comment-6003</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodrigoperez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 16:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=9338#comment-6003</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@mc i&#039;m not sure i agree, but I do appreciate your perspective.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@mc i&#8217;m not sure i agree, but I do appreciate your perspective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: mc		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/is-reader-too-subtle-for-its-own-good-20081202/#comment-6002</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mc]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Apr 2009 12:22:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=9338#comment-6002</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[sometimes we have to appreciate films in their context.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;&#039;the reader&#039; isnt meant to be fluid and emotionally satiating. even more appropriately, it doesnt do the audience pleasing thing as letting the emotions &quot;uncork&quot;. &lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;this is really an unusually done film in that respect. and makes a lot of sense if you see the film as a &#039;retrospect&#039; from the character&#039;s POV, trying to make sense of it all.&lt;BR/&gt;&lt;BR/&gt;..and kate winslet was tremendous with so little.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sometimes we have to appreciate films in their context.</p>
<p>&#8216;the reader&#8217; isnt meant to be fluid and emotionally satiating. even more appropriately, it doesnt do the audience pleasing thing as letting the emotions &#8220;uncork&#8221;. </p>
<p>this is really an unusually done film in that respect. and makes a lot of sense if you see the film as a &#8216;retrospect&#8217; from the character&#8217;s POV, trying to make sense of it all.</p>
<p>..and kate winslet was tremendous with so little.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: nick plowman		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/is-reader-too-subtle-for-its-own-good-20081202/#comment-2974</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[nick plowman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 14:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=9338#comment-2974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I seriously heard it was devastating and that Winslet was better in it than in Rev Road. But you say the exact opposite, and I trust you more really, so. Sucks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I seriously heard it was devastating and that Winslet was better in it than in Rev Road. But you say the exact opposite, and I trust you more really, so. Sucks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
