Comments on: ‘Immortals’ Producer Doesn’t Seem To Love 3D For Greek Epic But Can Live With The Business Decision

By: James

James — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:48:01 +0000

I don\’t understand the swipe toward Sanctum. Was it because underwater and 3D are a ripoff of the Piranha formula? Because first, Sanctum was -shot- in 3D, while Piranha was an inferior cookie cutter conversion. Second, Cameron has done underwater 3D before, with his Titanic documentary. Or maybe Canton was saying Sanctum was commercially panned? Which I again contest because then his own Piranha 3D was panned too, as it made just $2M more (and had 4x as long to do it btw).

All I know is, I\’m less excited about Immortals in 3D now that I know it\’s a cookie cutter conversion from the a-hole who can\’t take constructive criticism about doing 3D natively.

By: Mark

Mark — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:48:01 +0000

Yet to see The Fall, but The Cell was disastrous.

By: actionman

actionman — Fri, 13 May 2016 14:48:01 +0000

I can\’t fucking wait to see Immortals. 3-D, 2-D, who gives a shit? Tarsem is a visual genius in any format. I\’ll see both versions.

The Fall is a complete masterpiece, a total work of art, one of the best movies ever made. Yup — ever effing made. It\’s so personal and so utterly gorgeous and obviously something that was made with love in each and every way that it\’s hard to take other films seriously when you\’ve seen something so special like The Fall.

Anything that Tarsem puts his name on is something that needs to be taken seriously. And I\’m with Ebert on The Cell — incredible.