<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Ibiza&#8217; Trailer: Gillian Jacobs &#038; Friends Bring The Girls Trip Party To Spain	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ibiza-trailer-20180503/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ibiza-trailer-20180503/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 18:12:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LA2000		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ibiza-trailer-20180503/#comment-159974</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LA2000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2018 18:12:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=384480#comment-159974</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I find it hard to believe that Netflix couldn&#039;t have licensed the streaming rights to any one of the MANY pre-existing, higher wattage versions of the &quot;female Hangover&quot; concept for less than it cost to make this watered down version of the same ole thing. What is the content strategy here?

This thing could do a billion streams and it doesn&#039;t change one simple fact: originals are only an asset if they elevate the overall content quality expectations of subscribers. If you stream a disappointment a billion times, all you&#039;ve managed to do is disappoint a billion viewers. You know, like &quot;Cloverfield Paradox&quot;. It&#039;s a brilliant opportunity...until subscribers actually watch it.

Allowing the Netflix original features brand to become shorthand for &quot;pale imitations, test screening failures, and Sundance rejects&quot; will ultimately prove to be highly corrosive and extremely expensive to correct.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find it hard to believe that Netflix couldn&#8217;t have licensed the streaming rights to any one of the MANY pre-existing, higher wattage versions of the &#8220;female Hangover&#8221; concept for less than it cost to make this watered down version of the same ole thing. What is the content strategy here?</p>
<p>This thing could do a billion streams and it doesn&#8217;t change one simple fact: originals are only an asset if they elevate the overall content quality expectations of subscribers. If you stream a disappointment a billion times, all you&#8217;ve managed to do is disappoint a billion viewers. You know, like &#8220;Cloverfield Paradox&#8221;. It&#8217;s a brilliant opportunity&#8230;until subscribers actually watch it.</p>
<p>Allowing the Netflix original features brand to become shorthand for &#8220;pale imitations, test screening failures, and Sundance rejects&#8221; will ultimately prove to be highly corrosive and extremely expensive to correct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
