<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: How 5 Recent Horror Films Scared Up Big Success At The Box Office	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/how-5-recent-horror-films-scared-up-big-success-at-the-box-office-20130822/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/how-5-recent-horror-films-scared-up-big-success-at-the-box-office-20130822/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:13:13 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: El Hanso		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/how-5-recent-horror-films-scared-up-big-success-at-the-box-office-20130822/#comment-47117</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[El Hanso]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/how-5-recent-horror-films-scared-up-big-success-at-the-box-office-94525/#comment-47117</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is this a game of &#034;Which of the five does not belong?&#034; There&#x27;s no way &#034;Texas Chainsaw 3D&#034; can be part of this list. It might have narrowly reached profitable areas, but it made way less than everyone involved hoped. Not enough for a relatively expensive 3D (!) reboot of a classic, with a series of sequels and earlier reboots in the years between said classic and this film. There&#x27;s a reason the early announcement of a sequel has led to nothing so far. The second week drop was just extremely telling.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is this a game of &quot;Which of the five does not belong?&quot; There&#x27;s no way &quot;Texas Chainsaw 3D&quot; can be part of this list. It might have narrowly reached profitable areas, but it made way less than everyone involved hoped. Not enough for a relatively expensive 3D (!) reboot of a classic, with a series of sequels and earlier reboots in the years between said classic and this film. There&#x27;s a reason the early announcement of a sequel has led to nothing so far. The second week drop was just extremely telling.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arch		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/how-5-recent-horror-films-scared-up-big-success-at-the-box-office-20130822/#comment-47118</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:13:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/how-5-recent-horror-films-scared-up-big-success-at-the-box-office-94525/#comment-47118</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, looking back, it turns out that the Evil Dead remake was FAR from being a huge commercial success (unlike what Sony keeps saying here and there). Let&#x27;s admit it was more quite decent though.

By the way I really don&#x27;t share your excitement about &#034;The town...&#034;. Because they said it would be meta (codename for derivative and tongue in cheek) and because Gomez-Rejon directed the most unimaginative and phony AHS episode (which is a lot to say considering how bad this show actually is). Just sayin.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, looking back, it turns out that the Evil Dead remake was FAR from being a huge commercial success (unlike what Sony keeps saying here and there). Let&#x27;s admit it was more quite decent though.</p>
<p>By the way I really don&#x27;t share your excitement about &quot;The town&#8230;&quot;. Because they said it would be meta (codename for derivative and tongue in cheek) and because Gomez-Rejon directed the most unimaginative and phony AHS episode (which is a lot to say considering how bad this show actually is). Just sayin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
