<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Hansel &#038; Gretel&#8217; Director Tommy Wirkola Returns To Norway To Make That &#8216;Dead Snow&#8217; Sequel You Wanted	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/hansel-gretel-director-tommy-wirkola-returns-to-norway-to-make-that-dead-snow-sequel-you-wanted-20130212/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/hansel-gretel-director-tommy-wirkola-returns-to-norway-to-make-that-dead-snow-sequel-you-wanted-20130212/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:36:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Christian		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/hansel-gretel-director-tommy-wirkola-returns-to-norway-to-make-that-dead-snow-sequel-you-wanted-20130212/#comment-61313</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Christian]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:36:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/hansel-gretel-director-tommy-wirkola-returns-to-norway-to-make-that-dead-snow-sequel-you-wanted-101525/#comment-61313</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Wirkola&#x27;s efforts previous to his foray into Hollywood moviemaking are really, really terrible. I know the effect of exoticism and reading the dialogue (instead of hearing it) can quite often make a movie seem a little bit better than it is, but trust me, as a Norwegian I can tell you that &#x27;DÃ¸d SnÃ¸&#x27; (a retarded title chosen solely because &#x27;RÃ¸d SnÃ¸&#x27; (Red Snow), which makes more sense, was already taken) and (OH GOD NO, PLEASE!) &#x27;Kill Buljo&#x27; are terrible movies. Of course it&#x27;s difficult to argue about matters of taste, but an element that might get lost in translation is how ridiculously clunky they are. The editing is terrible, they&#x27;re shot with all the artistic flair of a AFV-submission, and the jokes are so stale that it makes Seltzer &#038; Friedberg seem like comedic geniuses. &#x27;Kill Buljo&#x27; is kind of like &#x27;The Room&#x27; or &#x27;Birdemic&#x27; of Norwegian comedy, but just, y&#x27;know, less funny. He also made &#x27;Kurt Josef Wagle og legenden om fjordheksa&#x27;, which nobody saw and&#x2F;or liked. So all in all he has made zero good movies.

The only thing that had people talking about &#x27;DÃ¸d SnÃ¸&#x27; was a scene were a guy chainsaws of his dick after it gets bit by a nazi zombie. Which I can agree is kind of fun, but doesn&#x27;t really excuse the rest of that wet fart of a movie. 

In Norway most movies are governmentally funded (at least in part) with taxpayers&#x27; money. They are especially generous towards projects produced outside of Oslo, as they&#x27;re trying to broaden and strengthen the national industry. Since Wirkola has been to Hollywood aaand probably will make &#x27;DÃ¸d SnÃ¸ 2: Reckoning&#x2F;DÃ¦y Ã¥f thÃ¸ DÃ¦Ã¦d&#x2F;Up the Khyber&#x27; in Northern Norway, he&#x27;ll get all the moneys. But I wants Joachim Trier to gets all the moneys. Please, lissen 2 meh, no encourage Wirkolas. Rent &#x27;Oslo, August 31st&#x27; instead. End of rant.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wirkola&#x27;s efforts previous to his foray into Hollywood moviemaking are really, really terrible. I know the effect of exoticism and reading the dialogue (instead of hearing it) can quite often make a movie seem a little bit better than it is, but trust me, as a Norwegian I can tell you that &#x27;DÃ¸d SnÃ¸&#x27; (a retarded title chosen solely because &#x27;RÃ¸d SnÃ¸&#x27; (Red Snow), which makes more sense, was already taken) and (OH GOD NO, PLEASE!) &#x27;Kill Buljo&#x27; are terrible movies. Of course it&#x27;s difficult to argue about matters of taste, but an element that might get lost in translation is how ridiculously clunky they are. The editing is terrible, they&#x27;re shot with all the artistic flair of a AFV-submission, and the jokes are so stale that it makes Seltzer &amp; Friedberg seem like comedic geniuses. &#x27;Kill Buljo&#x27; is kind of like &#x27;The Room&#x27; or &#x27;Birdemic&#x27; of Norwegian comedy, but just, y&#x27;know, less funny. He also made &#x27;Kurt Josef Wagle og legenden om fjordheksa&#x27;, which nobody saw and&#x2F;or liked. So all in all he has made zero good movies.</p>
<p>The only thing that had people talking about &#x27;DÃ¸d SnÃ¸&#x27; was a scene were a guy chainsaws of his dick after it gets bit by a nazi zombie. Which I can agree is kind of fun, but doesn&#x27;t really excuse the rest of that wet fart of a movie. </p>
<p>In Norway most movies are governmentally funded (at least in part) with taxpayers&#x27; money. They are especially generous towards projects produced outside of Oslo, as they&#x27;re trying to broaden and strengthen the national industry. Since Wirkola has been to Hollywood aaand probably will make &#x27;DÃ¸d SnÃ¸ 2: Reckoning&#x2F;DÃ¦y Ã¥f thÃ¸ DÃ¦Ã¦d&#x2F;Up the Khyber&#x27; in Northern Norway, he&#x27;ll get all the moneys. But I wants Joachim Trier to gets all the moneys. Please, lissen 2 meh, no encourage Wirkolas. Rent &#x27;Oslo, August 31st&#x27; instead. End of rant.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
