<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Gravity&#8217;s Rainbow: Natalie Portman Offered Lead In Alfonso Cuaron&#8217;s Space Epic	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/gravitys-rainbow-natalie-portman-20100907/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/gravitys-rainbow-natalie-portman-20100907/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2020 14:00:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Bobby		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/gravitys-rainbow-natalie-portman-20100907/#comment-23107</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 16:43:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1227#comment-23107</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I always read Playlist&#039;s stories and agree with them most of the time, but not always of course ;) An offer to Portman&#039;s makes as much sense as an offer to Sandra Bullock would (recent Oscar win + huge box-office power), or ScarJo did (recent Tony win + developing box-office power + newly acquired geek cred). My point is that with so many casting stories we&#039;ve had on this already, Portman news don&#039;t stand out as any more likely to turn out to be true then ScarJo news did for example.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always read Playlist&#39;s stories and agree with them most of the time, but not always of course 😉 An offer to Portman&#39;s makes as much sense as an offer to Sandra Bullock would (recent Oscar win + huge box-office power), or ScarJo did (recent Tony win + developing box-office power + newly acquired geek cred). My point is that with so many casting stories we&#39;ve had on this already, Portman news don&#39;t stand out as any more likely to turn out to be true then ScarJo news did for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rodrigoperez		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/gravitys-rainbow-natalie-portman-20100907/#comment-23104</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodrigoperez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 15:48:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1227#comment-23104</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What&#039;s so hard to believe that she&#039;s been offered the role, especially after a super buzzed-about turn in Black Swan that could lead to an Oscar buzz.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Cuaron isn&#039;t dumb, he knows this project is in jeopardy so it makes total sense to offer her the role.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whether she takes it or not is another matter though.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Readers need to learn what exactly to be skeptical about (that Weisz piece for example) and I think we do a very good job of trying to explain what&#039;s what. You just have to actually &lt;i&gt;read&lt;/i&gt; our stories.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#39;s so hard to believe that she&#39;s been offered the role, especially after a super buzzed-about turn in Black Swan that could lead to an Oscar buzz.</p>
<p>Cuaron isn&#39;t dumb, he knows this project is in jeopardy so it makes total sense to offer her the role.</p>
<p>Whether she takes it or not is another matter though.</p>
<p>Readers need to learn what exactly to be skeptical about (that Weisz piece for example) and I think we do a very good job of trying to explain what&#39;s what. You just have to actually <i>read</i> our stories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bobby		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/gravitys-rainbow-natalie-portman-20100907/#comment-23101</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:36:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1227#comment-23101</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Honestly, I don&#039;t believe any casting news ragarding this project anymore. Just a month ago trades reported WB was dead-set on either Scarlett Johansson or Blake Lively and the decision between these would be made in a week or two. Now they&#039;ve been reduced to just one of 238975634 other names dropped. I&#039;m waiting for official announcement from WB confirming who&#039;s replacing Jolie &#039;cause right now, it looks more like reps are planting their clients&#039; names all over the net to get them some free buzz.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, I don&#39;t believe any casting news ragarding this project anymore. Just a month ago trades reported WB was dead-set on either Scarlett Johansson or Blake Lively and the decision between these would be made in a week or two. Now they&#39;ve been reduced to just one of 238975634 other names dropped. I&#39;m waiting for official announcement from WB confirming who&#39;s replacing Jolie &#39;cause right now, it looks more like reps are planting their clients&#39; names all over the net to get them some free buzz.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: rodrigoperez		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/gravitys-rainbow-natalie-portman-20100907/#comment-23100</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodrigoperez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 14:04:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1227#comment-23100</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Bobby, read that report with eyes open. That&#039;s a non-denial. &#034;We did not announce anything this morning in relation to Gravity,&#034; Portman&#039;s publicist said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;of course they didn&#039;t. She&#039;s been offered the role, her publicist is not going to announce that. Decisions still need to be made.  But don&#039;t buy that bs for a second.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bobby, read that report with eyes open. That&#39;s a non-denial. &quot;We did not announce anything this morning in relation to Gravity,&quot; Portman&#39;s publicist said.</p>
<p>of course they didn&#39;t. She&#39;s been offered the role, her publicist is not going to announce that. Decisions still need to be made.  But don&#39;t buy that bs for a second.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bobby		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/gravitys-rainbow-natalie-portman-20100907/#comment-23099</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bobby]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Sep 2010 13:15:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1227#comment-23099</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Portman&#039;s publicist has already denied the reports: http://techland.com/2010/09/07/rumor-patroll-doctor-who-and-gravity-rumors-debunked/#ixzz0ywW8FbRY&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is getting more fun than The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo casting xD]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Portman&#39;s publicist has already denied the reports: <a href="http://techland.com/2010/09/07/rumor-patroll-doctor-who-and-gravity-rumors-debunked/#ixzz0ywW8FbRY" rel="nofollow ugc">http://techland.com/2010/09/07/rumor-patroll-doctor-who-and-gravity-rumors-debunked/#ixzz0ywW8FbRY</a></p>
<p>This is getting more fun than The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo casting xD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Theo C		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/gravitys-rainbow-natalie-portman-20100907/#comment-23070</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Theo C]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 16:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=1227#comment-23070</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Finally they have worked out that female scientists need to be brunettes. Blonde doesn&#039;t work in space, I&#039;d prefer Rachel Weisz but cant argue with Natalie (isn&#039;t she some kind of Science or Math geek in reality too).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Finally they have worked out that female scientists need to be brunettes. Blonde doesn&#39;t work in space, I&#39;d prefer Rachel Weisz but cant argue with Natalie (isn&#39;t she some kind of Science or Math geek in reality too).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
