<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Fox Reportedly Cut 20 Minutes From Park Chan-Wook&#8217;s &#8216;Stoker&#8217; &#038; Bong Joon-Ho Talks Next Projects	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-20140620/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-20140620/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Brandon		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-20140620/#comment-29745</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brandon]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-84593/#comment-29745</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;Stoker&#034; was easily my favorite film of 2013 - it&#x27;s incredible filmmaking and rewards repeated viewings. I would love to see the extra 20 minutes that were cut, but I have to say I think the film plays beautifully at it&#x27;s released running time. In the past I sometimes have felt PCK&#x27;s films have run a little long (&#034;Thirst&#034;), but I want to see those extra scenes. Check out Mark Kermode&#x27;s BBC video review of &#034;Stoker&#034; on You Tube - insightful and hilarious.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Stoker&quot; was easily my favorite film of 2013 &#8211; it&#x27;s incredible filmmaking and rewards repeated viewings. I would love to see the extra 20 minutes that were cut, but I have to say I think the film plays beautifully at it&#x27;s released running time. In the past I sometimes have felt PCK&#x27;s films have run a little long (&quot;Thirst&quot;), but I want to see those extra scenes. Check out Mark Kermode&#x27;s BBC video review of &quot;Stoker&quot; on You Tube &#8211; insightful and hilarious.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Peter Nellhaus		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-20140620/#comment-29746</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Peter Nellhaus]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-84593/#comment-29746</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dear Fox Searchlight:  Please issue the &#034;Director&#x27;s Cut&#034; Blu-ray of STOKER.  FYI, this was was one of my favorite films from last year.  Yours truly . .  .]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear Fox Searchlight:  Please issue the &quot;Director&#x27;s Cut&quot; Blu-ray of STOKER.  FYI, this was was one of my favorite films from last year.  Yours truly . .  .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Bill G		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-20140620/#comment-29747</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bill G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-84593/#comment-29747</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I really enjoyed Stoker and thought it was critically well received.  68% on Rotten Tomatoes isn&#x27;t that bad. Definitely would like to see 20 minutes more.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really enjoyed Stoker and thought it was critically well received.  68% on Rotten Tomatoes isn&#x27;t that bad. Definitely would like to see 20 minutes more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Arthur Fink		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-20140620/#comment-29748</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arthur Fink]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-84593/#comment-29748</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[If Matthew Goode&#x27;s character had turned out to be a vampire in a Let Me In meets Lolita-style twist (as the trailer suggested) I would have been happy. But the &#x27;twist reveal&#x27; we all saw coming a mile away is what ruined the film.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Matthew Goode&#x27;s character had turned out to be a vampire in a Let Me In meets Lolita-style twist (as the trailer suggested) I would have been happy. But the &#x27;twist reveal&#x27; we all saw coming a mile away is what ruined the film.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: MACCA		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-20140620/#comment-29749</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MACCA]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-84593/#comment-29749</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No idea that Stoker split opinion so much. It was my favourite film of 2013 (followed by ShortTerm12, Place Beyond The Pines, Warm Bodies, The Great Beauty... and IronMan3)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No idea that Stoker split opinion so much. It was my favourite film of 2013 (followed by ShortTerm12, Place Beyond The Pines, Warm Bodies, The Great Beauty&#8230; and IronMan3)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Emperor Zerg Rush		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-20140620/#comment-29750</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emperor Zerg Rush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-84593/#comment-29750</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Must&#x27;ve been the 20 good minutes of it. Direction was fine but that story&#x2F;screenplay was derivative and utterly silly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Must&#x27;ve been the 20 good minutes of it. Direction was fine but that story&#x2F;screenplay was derivative and utterly silly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: pat		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-20140620/#comment-29751</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[pat]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/fox-reportedly-cut-20-minutes-from-park-chan-wooks-stoker-bong-joon-ho-talks-next-projects-84593/#comment-29751</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I would LOVE 20 minutes more of Stoker.  I could be very wrong, but I think time will be kind to Stoker.  I thought it was pretty fantastic.  It could also look horrible in 10-15 years.  In any case, I&#x27;d love to see something that was a better approximation of Park&#x27;s vision]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would LOVE 20 minutes more of Stoker.  I could be very wrong, but I think time will be kind to Stoker.  I thought it was pretty fantastic.  It could also look horrible in 10-15 years.  In any case, I&#x27;d love to see something that was a better approximation of Park&#x27;s vision</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
