<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: First Official &#038; Bloody Look At Chloe Moretz &#038; Julianne Moore In Kimberly Peirce&#8217;s &#8216;Carrie&#8217; Remake	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-20120823/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-20120823/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:42:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Archer Slyce		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-20120823/#comment-70634</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Archer Slyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-106838/#comment-70634</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[So, Sony will give a first look of both Evil dead and Carrie at the New York Comic Con ... interesting.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, Sony will give a first look of both Evil dead and Carrie at the New York Comic Con &#8230; interesting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Tom		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-20120823/#comment-70635</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tom]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-106838/#comment-70635</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[No shower scene, no deal.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No shower scene, no deal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zack		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-20120823/#comment-70636</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-106838/#comment-70636</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Also, if they were really hewing closer to the book, Carrie&#x27;s supposed to be overweight and have acne and thinning hair. So I&#x27;m guessing they mean &#034;closer to the book&#034; the same way Tim Burton meant it when he kept repeating that while he was promoting &#034;Charlie &#038; the Chocolate Factory&#034;,  i.e. &#034;We&#x27;re deviating from the book as much as the first movie did, but we don&#x27;t want you to think we have nothing new to offer because we would very much like your money, if that&#x27;s okay.&#034;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, if they were really hewing closer to the book, Carrie&#x27;s supposed to be overweight and have acne and thinning hair. So I&#x27;m guessing they mean &quot;closer to the book&quot; the same way Tim Burton meant it when he kept repeating that while he was promoting &quot;Charlie &amp; the Chocolate Factory&quot;,  i.e. &quot;We&#x27;re deviating from the book as much as the first movie did, but we don&#x27;t want you to think we have nothing new to offer because we would very much like your money, if that&#x27;s okay.&quot;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: ArcherSlyce		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-20120823/#comment-70637</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ArcherSlyce]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-106838/#comment-70637</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The book is far from being King&#x27;s best work, its pseudo-scientific approach (telekinesis et al.) tends to ruin the whole thing. Which is why De Palma&#x27;s take on the book was great... it&#x27;s no just visually stunning, it deals with what really matters in the original story (namely that bullying thing, the relationship between Carrie and her mother).  So I don&#x27;t see why they should get closer to the book. Another common thing with remakes is that we tend to read the very same arguments and every press release is a carbon copy of the others... we&#x27;re reworking the thing ... we&#x27;re re re-imagining it. Hell for some reason kids discovering Carrie and Suspiria seems to think they have something to do with Black Sawn ! In any case, granted we only have two pictures to look at right now ... but common they look exactly like the original.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The book is far from being King&#x27;s best work, its pseudo-scientific approach (telekinesis et al.) tends to ruin the whole thing. Which is why De Palma&#x27;s take on the book was great&#8230; it&#x27;s no just visually stunning, it deals with what really matters in the original story (namely that bullying thing, the relationship between Carrie and her mother).  So I don&#x27;t see why they should get closer to the book. Another common thing with remakes is that we tend to read the very same arguments and every press release is a carbon copy of the others&#8230; we&#x27;re reworking the thing &#8230; we&#x27;re re re-imagining it. Hell for some reason kids discovering Carrie and Suspiria seems to think they have something to do with Black Sawn ! In any case, granted we only have two pictures to look at right now &#8230; but common they look exactly like the original.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Zack		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-20120823/#comment-70638</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Zack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-106838/#comment-70638</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[OHMIGOD SPOILERS YOUSE GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Also, wow, nice big-ass cross on Julianne Moore, just so we know she&#x27;s a religious fundamentalist, which will presumably not be established in any other way. I guess if they already got you to go to a remake of &#034;Carrie&#034;, it&#x27;s kind of their prerogative to assume you&#x27;re a moron.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OHMIGOD SPOILERS YOUSE GUYS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!<br />
Also, wow, nice big-ass cross on Julianne Moore, just so we know she&#x27;s a religious fundamentalist, which will presumably not be established in any other way. I guess if they already got you to go to a remake of &quot;Carrie&quot;, it&#x27;s kind of their prerogative to assume you&#x27;re a moron.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Taylor		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-20120823/#comment-70639</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Taylor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-106838/#comment-70639</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Looks awful.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Looks awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: james		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-20120823/#comment-70640</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[james]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 11:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/first-official-bloody-look-at-chloe-moretz-julianne-moore-in-kimberly-peirces-carrie-remake-106838/#comment-70640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[What&#x27;s the f-king point? What&#x27;s the f-king point? What&#x27;s the f-king point?!! 

Stop it Hollywood. STOP. IT.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#x27;s the f-king point? What&#x27;s the f-king point? What&#x27;s the f-king point?!! </p>
<p>Stop it Hollywood. STOP. IT.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
