<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Finding Dory&#8217; Takes Top Spot For Third Straight Week, &#8216;The Purge: Election Year&#8217; &#038; &#8216;The Legend Of Tarzan&#8217; Open Strong [Box Office]	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/finding-dory-takes-top-spot-third-straight-week-purge-election-year-legend-tarzan-open-strong-box-office-20160703/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/finding-dory-takes-top-spot-third-straight-week-purge-election-year-legend-tarzan-open-strong-box-office-20160703/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 13:13:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jh		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/finding-dory-takes-top-spot-third-straight-week-purge-election-year-legend-tarzan-open-strong-box-office-20160703/#comment-26354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 13:13:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=35198#comment-26354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s interesting that Tarzan is being spun as a &#039;success&#039;, because it came in higher than its incredibly low expectations, but ID2 is seen as a failure, even though it achieved a higher opening, on a lower budget, and will likely make more domestically and internationally. It&#039;s all just spin. A $38m opening for a $180m tentpole is not a success. There&#039;s no way it&#039;s getting a sequel.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s interesting that Tarzan is being spun as a &#8216;success&#8217;, because it came in higher than its incredibly low expectations, but ID2 is seen as a failure, even though it achieved a higher opening, on a lower budget, and will likely make more domestically and internationally. It&#8217;s all just spin. A $38m opening for a $180m tentpole is not a success. There&#8217;s no way it&#8217;s getting a sequel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: swell		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/finding-dory-takes-top-spot-third-straight-week-purge-election-year-legend-tarzan-open-strong-box-office-20160703/#comment-26349</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=35198#comment-26349</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[But yeah, at worst Tarzan is a small but not embarrassing loss, at best it just squeaks out a sequel.  Not bad.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But yeah, at worst Tarzan is a small but not embarrassing loss, at best it just squeaks out a sequel.  Not bad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: swell		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/finding-dory-takes-top-spot-third-straight-week-purge-election-year-legend-tarzan-open-strong-box-office-20160703/#comment-26348</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Jul 2016 00:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=35198#comment-26348</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Tarzan cost $180 mil... it&#039;s gonna have to do gangbusters overseas or have a remarkable hold to make bank.  Not all $45 million openings are created the same... films that cost THAT much, pre-marketing, print, theater cut, etc. have to make back roughly their production budget domestically to start to consider turning a profit... roughly $300 mil worldwide, give or take a few ten million, is the target for Tarzan to break even.  Through this Monday, it&#039;ll be at about $62 million, worldwide.   If it were $30-40 mil cheaper, it&#039;d be in good shape.  WB might decide that&#039;s enough to start sequel talks, but it&#039;s really gonna have to read the enthusiasm tea leaves cause it&#039;ll be a big gamble.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tarzan cost $180 mil&#8230; it&#8217;s gonna have to do gangbusters overseas or have a remarkable hold to make bank.  Not all $45 million openings are created the same&#8230; films that cost THAT much, pre-marketing, print, theater cut, etc. have to make back roughly their production budget domestically to start to consider turning a profit&#8230; roughly $300 mil worldwide, give or take a few ten million, is the target for Tarzan to break even.  Through this Monday, it&#8217;ll be at about $62 million, worldwide.   If it were $30-40 mil cheaper, it&#8217;d be in good shape.  WB might decide that&#8217;s enough to start sequel talks, but it&#8217;s really gonna have to read the enthusiasm tea leaves cause it&#8217;ll be a big gamble.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
