<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;Fantastic Four&#8217; Director Tim Story Says Silver Surfer&#8217;s Alien Origin More Acceptable Now Than In 2007	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fantastic-four-director-tim-story-says-silver-surfers-alien-origin-more-acceptable-now-than-in-2007-20140619/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fantastic-four-director-tim-story-says-silver-surfers-alien-origin-more-acceptable-now-than-in-2007-20140619/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Feb 2018 17:00:34 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Toyland Chairman		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/fantastic-four-director-tim-story-says-silver-surfers-alien-origin-more-acceptable-now-than-in-2007-20140619/#comment-29855</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Toyland Chairman]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:15:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/fantastic-four-director-tim-story-says-silver-surfers-alien-origin-more-acceptable-now-than-in-2007-84649/#comment-29855</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed his two FANTASTIC FOUR movies for what they are, but I would&#x27;ve preferred they go all out. I would&#x27;ve liked a SILVER SURFER spinoff, especially if Galactus was going to appear. And I mean the comic book giant, and not that big cloud thing seen in the second movie. A lot of people use the word &#034;grounded&#034; now, which is just a lesser way of saying realistic, but I don&#x27;t like that. It just holds films back, and tones down the fantasy. I look forward to GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY, but I was amazed when someone actually said these characters would never appear in an AVENGERS movie because AVENGERS is more &#034;grounded&#034;. Why the hell not? They exist in the exact same universe. Why can&#x27;t Beta Ray Bill appear in a THOR movie? Why can&#x27;t Batman fight Clayface or KillerCroc in a movie? Etc.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed his two FANTASTIC FOUR movies for what they are, but I would&#x27;ve preferred they go all out. I would&#x27;ve liked a SILVER SURFER spinoff, especially if Galactus was going to appear. And I mean the comic book giant, and not that big cloud thing seen in the second movie. A lot of people use the word &quot;grounded&quot; now, which is just a lesser way of saying realistic, but I don&#x27;t like that. It just holds films back, and tones down the fantasy. I look forward to GUARDIANS OF THE GALAXY, but I was amazed when someone actually said these characters would never appear in an AVENGERS movie because AVENGERS is more &quot;grounded&quot;. Why the hell not? They exist in the exact same universe. Why can&#x27;t Beta Ray Bill appear in a THOR movie? Why can&#x27;t Batman fight Clayface or KillerCroc in a movie? Etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
