Comments on: David Fincher Says ‘Alien 3’ “Director’s Cut” Version Is Not His

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Sat, 18 Jan 2014 03:41:38 +0000

Alien Resurrection was good ! And lot's of aliens fucking shit up. stop bitching obviously miss Weaver approved .

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Thu, 05 Dec 2013 07:44:39 +0000

Fincher is wrong. Alien 3 is a work of genius and if he hates it, it has more to do with his headaches in filming it than the actual film.

By: Monty Britton

Monty Britton — Sun, 03 Jun 2012 03:04:23 +0000

Fox needs to let Fincher take his film back and edit it the way he intended. This is bullshit that a studio would take a film from a gifted director and make it their own. We fans of the franchise and David Fincher deserve to see his vision and not this "assembly cut" that Finch had nothing to do with. Now that Fincher is a bankable director, he should be able to go back and show us his vision he intended with Alien 3. And NO interference from Fox at all.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Fri, 27 Apr 2012 03:55:07 +0000

Alien 3 is great. I don't care what Fincher thinks of it. The theatrical cut is superior to the bloated, silly extended cut. If you want a bad movie, rent Alien Resurrection. And it was never referred to as a Director's Cut.

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 28 Feb 2011 04:54:09 +0000

im pretty sure that cut of the movie is called "the assembly cut" so its not like false advertising. in the end this article seems pretty pointless

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 20:33:00 +0000

The director’s cut of that movie should have been the real movie – whether or not Fincher endorsed it. There are scenes that were deleted which explain things that otherwise leave a viewer asking, “Where the fuck did that come from?”

By: JMH

JMH — Wed, 04 Feb 2009 18:06:00 +0000

The Quadrilogy box set makes it clear that none of the directors endorse the extended versions therein.