<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Danny Boyle Talks The Unorthodox Construction Of &#8216;Trance,&#8217; Going Back To The Dark Side &#038; His Relationship With Writers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/danny-boyle-talks-the-unorthodox-construction-of-trance-going-back-to-the-dark-side-his-relationship-with-writers-20130409/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/danny-boyle-talks-the-unorthodox-construction-of-trance-going-back-to-the-dark-side-his-relationship-with-writers-20130409/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: CarlaVanessa		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/danny-boyle-talks-the-unorthodox-construction-of-trance-going-back-to-the-dark-side-his-relationship-with-writers-20130409/#comment-57863</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CarlaVanessa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/danny-boyle-talks-the-unorthodox-construction-of-trance-going-back-to-the-dark-side-his-relationship-with-writers-99631/#comment-57863</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(SPOILERS AHEAD) Wow. Boyle deserves some sort of medal for his astute observation that he can&#x27;t make a feminist film. Not that he should have to - bring on the Hitchcock-esque femme fatale with all the lusty lingering male gaze shots of Rosario Dawson&#x27;s Renaissance body if that&#x27;s what floats your boat (and why wouldn&#x27;t it?!; she&#x27;s smokin&#x27;). But his use of the femme fatale is not what makes this film so troublingly misogynistic. 

Dawson as the manipulative mastermind of this flashy revenge fantasy is old-school Hollywood trope, but this is overshadowed by a more worrying (and equally common) representation of women in film - the &#x27;victim&#x27;. And she&#x27;s a sensationalised victim too!: 
Watch her battered woman syndrome scale new heights as she seduces the ex-boyfriend that beat and assaulted her! 
Zoom in on her shaven vagina (in furtherance of a really weak plot point) and not only is she disempowered but also infantilised! 
Leave her alone in a room with a bunch of angry men and they can&#x27;t help but try to rape her! 
Never fear though; her long-term abuser will come to her rescue. Lets forgive the fact that he has a pathological propensity for violence against women (his anger gets the better of him and - oops! - he&#x27;s strangled one to death). 

Boyle&#x27;s film has a problem with misogyny, alright, and the femme fatale&#x27;s not the one to blame.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(SPOILERS AHEAD) Wow. Boyle deserves some sort of medal for his astute observation that he can&#x27;t make a feminist film. Not that he should have to &#8211; bring on the Hitchcock-esque femme fatale with all the lusty lingering male gaze shots of Rosario Dawson&#x27;s Renaissance body if that&#x27;s what floats your boat (and why wouldn&#x27;t it?!; she&#x27;s smokin&#x27;). But his use of the femme fatale is not what makes this film so troublingly misogynistic. </p>
<p>Dawson as the manipulative mastermind of this flashy revenge fantasy is old-school Hollywood trope, but this is overshadowed by a more worrying (and equally common) representation of women in film &#8211; the &#x27;victim&#x27;. And she&#x27;s a sensationalised victim too!:<br />
Watch her battered woman syndrome scale new heights as she seduces the ex-boyfriend that beat and assaulted her!<br />
Zoom in on her shaven vagina (in furtherance of a really weak plot point) and not only is she disempowered but also infantilised!<br />
Leave her alone in a room with a bunch of angry men and they can&#x27;t help but try to rape her!<br />
Never fear though; her long-term abuser will come to her rescue. Lets forgive the fact that he has a pathological propensity for violence against women (his anger gets the better of him and &#8211; oops! &#8211; he&#x27;s strangled one to death). </p>
<p>Boyle&#x27;s film has a problem with misogyny, alright, and the femme fatale&#x27;s not the one to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: CarlaVanessa		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/danny-boyle-talks-the-unorthodox-construction-of-trance-going-back-to-the-dark-side-his-relationship-with-writers-20130409/#comment-57864</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[CarlaVanessa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/danny-boyle-talks-the-unorthodox-construction-of-trance-going-back-to-the-dark-side-his-relationship-with-writers-99631/#comment-57864</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[(SPOILERS AHEAD) Wow. Boyle deserves some sort of medal for his astute observation that he can&#x27;t make a feminist film. Not that he should have to - bring on the Hitchcock-esque femme fatale with all the lusty lingering male gaze shots of Rosario Dawson&#x27;s Renaissance body if that&#x27;s what floats your boat (and why wouldn&#x27;t it?!; she&#x27;s smokin&#x27;). But his use of the femme fatale is not what makes this film so troublingly misogynistic. 

Dawson as the manipulative mastermind of this flashy revenge fantasy is old-school Hollywood trope, but this is overshadowed by a more worrying (and equally common) representation of women in film - the &#x27;victim&#x27;. And she&#x27;s a sensationalised victim too!: 
Watch her battered woman syndrome scale new heights as she seduces the ex-boyfriend that beat and assaulted her! 
Zoom in on her shaven vagina (in furtherance of a really weak plot point) and not only is she disempowered but also infantilised! 
Leave her alone in a room with a bunch of angry men and they can&#x27;t help but try to rape her! 
Never fear though; her long-term abuser will come to her rescue. Lets forgive the fact that he has a pathological propensity for violence against women (his anger gets the better of him and - oops! - he&#x27;s strangled one to death). 

Boyle&#x27;s film has a problem with misogyny, alright, and the femme fatale&#x27;s not the one to blame.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>(SPOILERS AHEAD) Wow. Boyle deserves some sort of medal for his astute observation that he can&#x27;t make a feminist film. Not that he should have to &#8211; bring on the Hitchcock-esque femme fatale with all the lusty lingering male gaze shots of Rosario Dawson&#x27;s Renaissance body if that&#x27;s what floats your boat (and why wouldn&#x27;t it?!; she&#x27;s smokin&#x27;). But his use of the femme fatale is not what makes this film so troublingly misogynistic. </p>
<p>Dawson as the manipulative mastermind of this flashy revenge fantasy is old-school Hollywood trope, but this is overshadowed by a more worrying (and equally common) representation of women in film &#8211; the &#x27;victim&#x27;. And she&#x27;s a sensationalised victim too!:<br />
Watch her battered woman syndrome scale new heights as she seduces the ex-boyfriend that beat and assaulted her!<br />
Zoom in on her shaven vagina (in furtherance of a really weak plot point) and not only is she disempowered but also infantilised!<br />
Leave her alone in a room with a bunch of angry men and they can&#x27;t help but try to rape her!<br />
Never fear though; her long-term abuser will come to her rescue. Lets forgive the fact that he has a pathological propensity for violence against women (his anger gets the better of him and &#8211; oops! &#8211; he&#x27;s strangled one to death). </p>
<p>Boyle&#x27;s film has a problem with misogyny, alright, and the femme fatale&#x27;s not the one to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
