<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Common Takes Villain Role In &#8216;John Wick 2,&#8217; Ian McShane Returns	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/common-takes-villain-role-in-john-wick-2-ian-mcshane-returns-20151027/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/common-takes-villain-role-in-john-wick-2-ian-mcshane-returns-20151027/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:16:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Emperor Zerg Rush		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/common-takes-villain-role-in-john-wick-2-ian-mcshane-returns-20151027/#comment-76223</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Emperor Zerg Rush]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:16:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/common-takes-villain-role-in-john-wick-2-ian-mcshane-returns-109574/#comment-76223</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The first film shouldn\&#039;t have worked as well as it did. If you go back and watch it with any intention on analyzing what\&#039;s happening/etc, you begin to notice a lot of flaws (many of which wouldn\&#039;t be forgiven in a much bigger film). At the same time, it\&#039;s hard not to just accept that it has those flaws. It\&#039;s a weird limbo line, especially for the type of film it is. Anyway, one thing I can do without in this sequel would be digital dog mess. I think we all get the point - dogs have to defecate too. Doesn\&#039;t mean we need to see it digitally rendered as a reminder because we were suddenly stricken with a specific memory loss about it.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The first film shouldn\&#8217;t have worked as well as it did. If you go back and watch it with any intention on analyzing what\&#8217;s happening/etc, you begin to notice a lot of flaws (many of which wouldn\&#8217;t be forgiven in a much bigger film). At the same time, it\&#8217;s hard not to just accept that it has those flaws. It\&#8217;s a weird limbo line, especially for the type of film it is. Anyway, one thing I can do without in this sequel would be digital dog mess. I think we all get the point &#8211; dogs have to defecate too. Doesn\&#8217;t mean we need to see it digitally rendered as a reminder because we were suddenly stricken with a specific memory loss about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
