<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Christopher Doyle Says He&#8217;s The &#8220;Keith Richards Of Cinematography,&#8221; Disses &#8216;Wolf Of Wall Street&#8217; &#038; More	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-20140502/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-20140502/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:36:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ugh		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-20140502/#comment-33454</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ugh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-86442/#comment-33454</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[It&#x27;s kinda cute how much Christopher Doyle picks on Scorsese.   Whatever.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#x27;s kinda cute how much Christopher Doyle picks on Scorsese.   Whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: John		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-20140502/#comment-33455</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[John]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-86442/#comment-33455</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Two of his children posted comments on this thread,amazing.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Two of his children posted comments on this thread,amazing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Rod		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-20140502/#comment-33456</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Rod]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-86442/#comment-33456</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[totally agree with his assessment of Life of Pi. boggles my mind how anyone could see that film as anything other than an insult to cinema. Lincoln sucked balls, too, apart from the at times hammy performance by Day-Lewis and the great turn by Spader.

totally disagree on his opinion of Scorsese, though. a film doesn&#x27;t have to be sophisticated or &#034;important&#034; to be a rollicking good film. i&#x27;d actually take Doyle to task at the film not being important. the pitfalls of wall street hedonism is as culturally relevant today as it was a decade or three ago.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>totally agree with his assessment of Life of Pi. boggles my mind how anyone could see that film as anything other than an insult to cinema. Lincoln sucked balls, too, apart from the at times hammy performance by Day-Lewis and the great turn by Spader.</p>
<p>totally disagree on his opinion of Scorsese, though. a film doesn&#x27;t have to be sophisticated or &quot;important&quot; to be a rollicking good film. i&#x27;d actually take Doyle to task at the film not being important. the pitfalls of wall street hedonism is as culturally relevant today as it was a decade or three ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: A-man		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-20140502/#comment-33457</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A-man]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-86442/#comment-33457</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Legend - I wish more people in Hollywood had the balls to call out the pandering masses who celebrate a director who has lost most (if not all) of his spark and hasn&#x27;t made a good film in 20 years...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Legend &#8211; I wish more people in Hollywood had the balls to call out the pandering masses who celebrate a director who has lost most (if not all) of his spark and hasn&#x27;t made a good film in 20 years&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: T		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-20140502/#comment-33458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[T]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 07:36:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2014/more/uncategorized/christopher-doyle-says-hes-the-keith-richards-of-cinematography-disses-wolf-of-wall-street-more-86442/#comment-33458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1 man&#x27;s (twisted) opinion- just leave it at that....

Moving on....]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 man&#x27;s (twisted) opinion- just leave it at that&#8230;.</p>
<p>Moving on&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
