<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Cannes Review: Sprawling &#8216;Hemingway &#038; Gellhorn&#8217; Worthy Of The Rough &#038; Tumble Life Of Two Great Writers	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/cannes-review-sprawling-hemingway-gellhorn-worthy-of-the-rough-tumble-life-of-two-great-writers-20120526/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/cannes-review-sprawling-hemingway-gellhorn-worthy-of-the-rough-tumble-life-of-two-great-writers-20120526/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:24:43 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Dude		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/cannes-review-sprawling-hemingway-gellhorn-worthy-of-the-rough-tumble-life-of-two-great-writers-20120526/#comment-77666</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Dude]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/cannes-review-sprawling-hemingway-gellhorn-worthy-of-the-rough-tumble-life-of-two-great-writers-110275/#comment-77666</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;the film switches to a faux-damaged-film stock&#x2F;sepia tone treatment whenever scenes of battle or anything that looks like it would&#x27;ve been expensive is shot.&#034;

Most of that footage is not Faux footage, it is actually newsreel footage from the real events.  It looks like it would be expensive to shoot because it is the real deal and the filmmakers have digitally inserted the movie&#x27;s actors into the footage.  I think it looks great, mostly &#x27;cause I helped provide some of the footage to the filmmakers.  Reality is more convincing than fiction, especially when your dealing with war footage.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;the film switches to a faux-damaged-film stock&#x2F;sepia tone treatment whenever scenes of battle or anything that looks like it would&#x27;ve been expensive is shot.&quot;</p>
<p>Most of that footage is not Faux footage, it is actually newsreel footage from the real events.  It looks like it would be expensive to shoot because it is the real deal and the filmmakers have digitally inserted the movie&#x27;s actors into the footage.  I think it looks great, mostly &#x27;cause I helped provide some of the footage to the filmmakers.  Reality is more convincing than fiction, especially when your dealing with war footage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Alan		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/cannes-review-sprawling-hemingway-gellhorn-worthy-of-the-rough-tumble-life-of-two-great-writers-20120526/#comment-77667</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Alan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 12:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2012/more/uncategorized/cannes-review-sprawling-hemingway-gellhorn-worthy-of-the-rough-tumble-life-of-two-great-writers-110275/#comment-77667</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;Corey Stoll rightfully earned praise for his just-slightly-over-the-top portrayal of Hemingway in Woody Allen&#x27;s &#034;Midnight In Paris.&#034;&#034; 

Err, Allen conceived Hemingway (and all the artists in the film) as cliches, so being &#x27;over-the-top&#x27; was necessary for the filmmakers&#x27; conception of the character. If there is a problem with the character, it is Allen&#x27;s one-note writing, not the performance.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Corey Stoll rightfully earned praise for his just-slightly-over-the-top portrayal of Hemingway in Woody Allen&#x27;s &quot;Midnight In Paris.&quot;&quot; </p>
<p>Err, Allen conceived Hemingway (and all the artists in the film) as cliches, so being &#x27;over-the-top&#x27; was necessary for the filmmakers&#x27; conception of the character. If there is a problem with the character, it is Allen&#x27;s one-note writing, not the performance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
