By: Chaim Paddaman

Chaim Paddaman — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:00:40 +0000

Roman Polanski apologist Jean Melkovsky writes in the Los Angeles Times: " All the existing documents emphazise " The outstanding maturity and sexual experience ot the Polanski rape victim. Melkovsky blames the physical maturity and willingness of the victim. Polanski is not a peadophile. The offence occured as an isolated instance of trasient poor judgement. Peadophiles argue that their victims asked for it, and got it.
It is common knowledge that if a child presents with promiscuous and provocative behavior, the minor will be classified as a vulnerable child, thus placed on a register for vulnerable children, and protected under statutory laws. Roman Polanski took advantage of such a child. It is amazing how liberals tend to ignore the ethics of Statutory laws when it suits them. Roman Polanski is not a great man, he is a very sick man. Jean Melkovsky can smear the victim as much as he/she likes. It won't wash….. Laurent Bouzereau involved with Steven Spielberg, interesting………………………………

By: James

James — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:00:40 +0000

Great review, can't wait to see the film. Only one quibble. Laurent Bouzereau is not Polanski's "longtime producing partner". He's a DVD special features guru who has done almost all the content for Spielberg's DVDs, DVDs of Hitchcock's films, and countless others. He doesn't produce features.

Comments on: Cannes Review: ‘Roman Polanski: A Film Memoir’ A Fascinating Look At The Director As Told By The Man Himself

By: Chaim Paddaman

By: James