<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Cannes 2009: Gilliam&#8217;s &#8216;Imaginarium&#8217; Too Whimsical, Capricious &#038; Incoherent?	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/cannes-2009-gilliams-imaginarium-too-20090526/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/cannes-2009-gilliams-imaginarium-too-20090526/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2020 13:00:54 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: rodrigoperez		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/cannes-2009-gilliams-imaginarium-too-20090526/#comment-7354</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[rodrigoperez]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:44:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=7393#comment-7354</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[screendaily i missed, the others beside BBC are not people i trust.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>screendaily i missed, the others beside BBC are not people i trust.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: brou		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/cannes-2009-gilliams-imaginarium-too-20090526/#comment-7339</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[brou]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 14:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.wpengine.com/?p=7393#comment-7339</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The reviews are mixed but the way you quote them made them appear absolutely awful... The reviewers aren&#039;t all raving about it all over the place but, for example, Variety&#039;s review is more positive than what you suggest.&lt;br /&gt;Other reviews : http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/reviews/preposterously-gloriously-gilliam-simon-reviews-the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus.php&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.screendaily.com/the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/5001694.article&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=334&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And the full BBC review :&lt;br /&gt;http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8064005.stm]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reviews are mixed but the way you quote them made them appear absolutely awful&#8230; The reviewers aren&#8217;t all raving about it all over the place but, for example, Variety&#8217;s review is more positive than what you suggest.<br />Other reviews : <a href="http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/reviews/preposterously-gloriously-gilliam-simon-reviews-the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus.php" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.obsessedwithfilm.com/reviews/preposterously-gloriously-gilliam-simon-reviews-the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus.php</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.screendaily.com/the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/5001694.article" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.screendaily.com/the-imaginarium-of-doctor-parnassus/5001694.article</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=334" rel="nofollow ugc">http://www.showbiz411.com/?p=334</a></p>
<p>And the full BBC review :<br /><a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8064005.stm" rel="nofollow ugc">http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/8064005.stm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
