<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Bret Easton Ellis Lines Up Directorial Debut &#8216;The Deleted&#8217;	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-20160426/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-20160426/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:30:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: jimmiescoffee		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-20160426/#comment-147811</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jimmiescoffee]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2016 16:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-292163/#comment-147811</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[i agree. \&#039;less than Zero\&#039; is awful and has dated horribly.  \&#039;Rules of Attraction\&#039; is very good in my opinion and hasn\&#039;t aged a day. it captures that time perfectly. best with exception of \&#039;American Psycho.\&#039;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i agree. \&#8217;less than Zero\&#8217; is awful and has dated horribly.  \&#8217;Rules of Attraction\&#8217; is very good in my opinion and hasn\&#8217;t aged a day. it captures that time perfectly. best with exception of \&#8217;American Psycho.\&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Probably		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-20160426/#comment-147812</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Probably]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 21:34:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-292163/#comment-147812</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Pretty sure you mixed up the receptions for Less Than Zero and Rules of Attraction.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty sure you mixed up the receptions for Less Than Zero and Rules of Attraction.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Stephen		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-20160426/#comment-147813</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Stephen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-292163/#comment-147813</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Have to agree. It\&#039;s an interesting film visually because Ed Lachmann was the DP and the sets look like a music video which would work perfectly as subtext for how superficial these kids\&#039; Hollywood world is, if it weren\&#039;t for the fact that the film itself is also very superficial. But I\&#039;ll defend Rules of Attraction. Not a great film, but enjoyable and a good adaptation of the book.
Also, Ellis had another screenwriting credit with that Curse of Downer\&#039;s Grove movie, which I think he basically disowned (he only mentioned it once in passing on his podcast as some terrible movie they made from his script and he didn\&#039;t even meet the director).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have to agree. It\&#8217;s an interesting film visually because Ed Lachmann was the DP and the sets look like a music video which would work perfectly as subtext for how superficial these kids\&#8217; Hollywood world is, if it weren\&#8217;t for the fact that the film itself is also very superficial. But I\&#8217;ll defend Rules of Attraction. Not a great film, but enjoyable and a good adaptation of the book.<br />
Also, Ellis had another screenwriting credit with that Curse of Downer\&#8217;s Grove movie, which I think he basically disowned (he only mentioned it once in passing on his podcast as some terrible movie they made from his script and he didn\&#8217;t even meet the director).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: C-Jo		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-20160426/#comment-147814</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C-Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-292163/#comment-147814</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I love Less Than Zero! I watch it every Christmas. Great soundtrack!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love Less Than Zero! I watch it every Christmas. Great soundtrack!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: yaeh		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-20160426/#comment-147815</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[yaeh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Apr 2016 19:38:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/bret-easton-ellis-lines-up-directorial-debut-the-deleted-292163/#comment-147815</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;\&#039;Less Than Zero,\&#039; a film that was met with lukewarm reviews in 1987 but has aged very well and features one of Robert Downey Jr.\&#039;s best performances.&#034; Guessing you haven\&#039;t revisited this film in a while. Mediocre in 87 and it\&#039;s aged really poorly.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;\&#8217;Less Than Zero,\&#8217; a film that was met with lukewarm reviews in 1987 but has aged very well and features one of Robert Downey Jr.\&#8217;s best performances.&quot; Guessing you haven\&#8217;t revisited this film in a while. Mediocre in 87 and it\&#8217;s aged really poorly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
