<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Box Office: &#8216;The Jungle Book&#8217; Trounces &#8216;The Huntsman: Winter&#8217;s War&#8217; And Once Again Takes Top Spot	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-the-jungle-book-trounces-the-huntsman-winters-war-and-once-again-takes-top-spot-20160424/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-the-jungle-book-trounces-the-huntsman-winters-war-and-once-again-takes-top-spot-20160424/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 31 Aug 2016 02:33:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Oppenheimer		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-the-jungle-book-trounces-the-huntsman-winters-war-and-once-again-takes-top-spot-20160424/#comment-147871</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Oppenheimer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2016 09:35:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/box-office-the-jungle-book-trounces-the-huntsman-winters-war-and-once-again-takes-top-spot-292237/#comment-147871</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Huntsman figures are a little misleading. It actually had a great opening weekend, WORLDWIDE. In fact, it\&#039;s opening weekend gross was better than SWATH\&#039;s. Worldwide: $98,581,697 for The Huntsman, only $95,600 for SWATH. It\&#039;s funny you always focus on the domestic box office, when increasingly, films are making the majority of their gross overseas. I don\&#039;t suppose you will correct the record to accurately reflect that The Huntsman had a better opening weekend worldwide than SWATH did. Huntsman also had a production budget of $117 million, and it\&#039;s almost recouped that on opening weekend. This film will go on to be profitable, so to declare the franchise dead or even wounded at this point is a joke. You can do the projections as well as I can, and you know this movie will be profitable. So the Jungle Book had a great opening? That\&#039;s great, but in the long run, I think we\&#039;ll see another in the Huntsman franchise. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Huntsman figures are a little misleading. It actually had a great opening weekend, WORLDWIDE. In fact, it\&#8217;s opening weekend gross was better than SWATH\&#8217;s. Worldwide: $98,581,697 for The Huntsman, only $95,600 for SWATH. It\&#8217;s funny you always focus on the domestic box office, when increasingly, films are making the majority of their gross overseas. I don\&#8217;t suppose you will correct the record to accurately reflect that The Huntsman had a better opening weekend worldwide than SWATH did. Huntsman also had a production budget of $117 million, and it\&#8217;s almost recouped that on opening weekend. This film will go on to be profitable, so to declare the franchise dead or even wounded at this point is a joke. You can do the projections as well as I can, and you know this movie will be profitable. So the Jungle Book had a great opening? That\&#8217;s great, but in the long run, I think we\&#8217;ll see another in the Huntsman franchise. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: swell		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-the-jungle-book-trounces-the-huntsman-winters-war-and-once-again-takes-top-spot-20160424/#comment-147872</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[swell]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Apr 2016 22:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2016/more/uncategorized/box-office-the-jungle-book-trounces-the-huntsman-winters-war-and-once-again-takes-top-spot-292237/#comment-147872</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Love Tom Hanks, but &#034;a home run every time out&#034;?  Outside of Bridge of Spies and Captain Phillips, his films have been critical or commercial failures for over a decade now.  He is in serious need of some consistency after, and I\&#039;m excluding forgotten supporting parts, Saving Mr Banks, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, Cloud Atlas, Larry Crowne, Angels and Demons, Charlie Wilson\&#039;s War, and The Da Vinci Code... it\&#039;s been over a decade since Hanks was money in the bank (though his performances are always on point, including with this one, from what I hear.)]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Love Tom Hanks, but &quot;a home run every time out&quot;?  Outside of Bridge of Spies and Captain Phillips, his films have been critical or commercial failures for over a decade now.  He is in serious need of some consistency after, and I\&#8217;m excluding forgotten supporting parts, Saving Mr Banks, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close, Cloud Atlas, Larry Crowne, Angels and Demons, Charlie Wilson\&#8217;s War, and The Da Vinci Code&#8230; it\&#8217;s been over a decade since Hanks was money in the bank (though his performances are always on point, including with this one, from what I hear.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
