<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Box Office: &#8216;Lee Daniels&#8217; The Butler&#8217; Withstands &#8216;The World&#8217;s End&#8217; &#038; &#8216;The Mortal Instruments&#8217; To Take #1 For Second Week	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-lee-daniels-the-butler-withstands-the-worlds-end-the-mortal-instruments-to-take-1-for-second-week-20130825/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-lee-daniels-the-butler-withstands-the-worlds-end-the-mortal-instruments-to-take-1-for-second-week-20130825/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:12:33 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Arch		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-lee-daniels-the-butler-withstands-the-worlds-end-the-mortal-instruments-to-take-1-for-second-week-20130825/#comment-46983</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Arch]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 09:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/box-office-lee-daniels-the-butler-withstands-the-worlds-end-the-mortal-instruments-to-take-1-for-second-week-94465/#comment-46983</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[And to think that studio expectation placed You&#x27;re next at #1.
Nobody is loosing money but that must be a deception at Lionsgate, specially considering that they had almost a thousand more screens than The world&#x27;s end and that they must have spend a lot on the viral campaign.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And to think that studio expectation placed You&#x27;re next at #1.<br />
Nobody is loosing money but that must be a deception at Lionsgate, specially considering that they had almost a thousand more screens than The world&#x27;s end and that they must have spend a lot on the viral campaign.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
