<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Box Office: &#8216;Gravity&#8217; Stays In Top Spot With 2nd Best Hold Of 2013; &#8216;Captain Phillips&#8217; Ships In 2nd With $26 Million	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-gravity-stays-in-top-spot-with-2nd-best-hold-of-2013-captain-phillips-ships-in-2nd-with-26-million-20131013/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-gravity-stays-in-top-spot-with-2nd-best-hold-of-2013-captain-phillips-ships-in-2nd-with-26-million-20131013/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 08:51:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: GOD		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-gravity-stays-in-top-spot-with-2nd-best-hold-of-2013-captain-phillips-ships-in-2nd-with-26-million-20131013/#comment-43440</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[GOD]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 08:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/box-office-gravity-stays-in-top-spot-with-2nd-best-hold-of-2013-captain-phillips-ships-in-2nd-with-26-million-92696/#comment-43440</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Why did you stop putting funny names for the movies?
Atleast that was the only thing good about hack writer, what-is-his-name...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why did you stop putting funny names for the movies?<br />
Atleast that was the only thing good about hack writer, what-is-his-name&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: moseari		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-gravity-stays-in-top-spot-with-2nd-best-hold-of-2013-captain-phillips-ships-in-2nd-with-26-million-20131013/#comment-43441</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[moseari]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 08:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/box-office-gravity-stays-in-top-spot-with-2nd-best-hold-of-2013-captain-phillips-ships-in-2nd-with-26-million-92696/#comment-43441</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Captain Phillips is better than the animated VFX video game that is Gravity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captain Phillips is better than the animated VFX video game that is Gravity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Leigh Richert		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/box-office-gravity-stays-in-top-spot-with-2nd-best-hold-of-2013-captain-phillips-ships-in-2nd-with-26-million-20131013/#comment-43442</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Leigh Richert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 08:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/box-office-gravity-stays-in-top-spot-with-2nd-best-hold-of-2013-captain-phillips-ships-in-2nd-with-26-million-92696/#comment-43442</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&#034;Overall box office was down only 10 percent from last year.&#034;  You state this as if it were a good thing.  Like this year has been down by big numbers constantly or something, and it has not.  I do not understand why a 10 percent drop is good news.  Could you please explain it to me?  I&#x27;m dying to know.  Are you trying to say something with this stat written like this, or is it just shitty writing?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&quot;Overall box office was down only 10 percent from last year.&quot;  You state this as if it were a good thing.  Like this year has been down by big numbers constantly or something, and it has not.  I do not understand why a 10 percent drop is good news.  Could you please explain it to me?  I&#x27;m dying to know.  Are you trying to say something with this stat written like this, or is it just shitty writing?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
