<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Berlin Review: The Trials Of &#8216;Camille Claudel 1915&#8217; Make For Trying Watching, Even With Juliette Binoche In Peerless Form	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/berlin-review-the-trials-of-camille-claudel-1915-make-for-trying-watching-even-with-juliette-binoche-in-peerless-form-20130216/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/berlin-review-the-trials-of-camille-claudel-1915-make-for-trying-watching-even-with-juliette-binoche-in-peerless-form-20130216/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:17:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Ardilaun		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/berlin-review-the-trials-of-camille-claudel-1915-make-for-trying-watching-even-with-juliette-binoche-in-peerless-form-20130216/#comment-111726</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ardilaun]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/berlin-review-the-trials-of-camille-claudel-1915-make-for-trying-watching-even-with-juliette-binoche-in-peerless-form-249245/#comment-111726</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Any review that talks about &#034;we&#034; and suggests that &#034;we had a really hard time maintaining our attention...&#034; is absolute bull-shit and to think that a journalist would submit it and put her name to it is staggering. This is a poor review in which the reviewer has little understanding of the film, of it&#x27;s subject and of the director&#x27;s oeuvre and resorts to suggesting that her view-point has credence because &#034;we&#034; all felt the same. This should be removed and a relevant review should be filed - be that positive or negative.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any review that talks about &quot;we&quot; and suggests that &quot;we had a really hard time maintaining our attention&#8230;&quot; is absolute bull-shit and to think that a journalist would submit it and put her name to it is staggering. This is a poor review in which the reviewer has little understanding of the film, of it&#x27;s subject and of the director&#x27;s oeuvre and resorts to suggesting that her view-point has credence because &quot;we&quot; all felt the same. This should be removed and a relevant review should be filed &#8211; be that positive or negative.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: 35		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/berlin-review-the-trials-of-camille-claudel-1915-make-for-trying-watching-even-with-juliette-binoche-in-peerless-form-20130216/#comment-111727</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[35]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 22 May 2016 03:17:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/berlin-review-the-trials-of-camille-claudel-1915-make-for-trying-watching-even-with-juliette-binoche-in-peerless-form-249245/#comment-111727</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Dumont is awful. Twentynine Palms is one of the most vacuous, obnoxious pictures I&#x27;ve ever seen]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dumont is awful. Twentynine Palms is one of the most vacuous, obnoxious pictures I&#x27;ve ever seen</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
