<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Rumor: Sorry Ben Affleck, Matt Reeves Wants Another Actor For Batman	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ben-affleck-matt-reeves-batman-20171116/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ben-affleck-matt-reeves-batman-20171116/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:10:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: LA2000		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/ben-affleck-matt-reeves-batman-20171116/#comment-156458</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LA2000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Nov 2017 21:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://theplaylist.net/?p=376403#comment-156458</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Seriously, Reeves and Abrams should just swap franchises.

&quot;Batman&quot; already did the moody, self-serious version with Nolan. What DC seems to want is a more effervescent, Marvel-esque take on their characters. Abrams is much better at that than Reeves, a director whose taste seems to lean dark and atmospheric. You could produce a long list of affirmatives about the work of Matt Reeves but &quot;fun&quot; would not be in the top 10.

On the &quot;Star Wars&quot; side of things, Abrams has already done this gig and while &quot;Force Awakens&quot; was just fine, his second tour isn&#039;t going to inspire the same degree of anticipation as his first. Moving over to &quot;Batman&quot; would allow him to revitalize an entirely new franchise (his expertise) without literally repeating himself. Superheroes are fresh territory him. Futhermore, the &quot;Star Wars&quot; series is operatic by nature and could use a dose of some &quot;Empire Strikes Back&quot; gravitas that was completely lacking from &quot;Force Awakens&quot;. That is much more in Reeves wheelhouse than either Johnson or Abrams.

As it currently stands both directors and franchises are cruising for a bruising, Abrams/Star Wars for repeating themselves and Reeves/Batman for not exceeding the cultural resonance of Nolan&#039;s dark take on the character. Swapping would serve both series and both directors.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, Reeves and Abrams should just swap franchises.</p>
<p>&#8220;Batman&#8221; already did the moody, self-serious version with Nolan. What DC seems to want is a more effervescent, Marvel-esque take on their characters. Abrams is much better at that than Reeves, a director whose taste seems to lean dark and atmospheric. You could produce a long list of affirmatives about the work of Matt Reeves but &#8220;fun&#8221; would not be in the top 10.</p>
<p>On the &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; side of things, Abrams has already done this gig and while &#8220;Force Awakens&#8221; was just fine, his second tour isn&#8217;t going to inspire the same degree of anticipation as his first. Moving over to &#8220;Batman&#8221; would allow him to revitalize an entirely new franchise (his expertise) without literally repeating himself. Superheroes are fresh territory him. Futhermore, the &#8220;Star Wars&#8221; series is operatic by nature and could use a dose of some &#8220;Empire Strikes Back&#8221; gravitas that was completely lacking from &#8220;Force Awakens&#8221;. That is much more in Reeves wheelhouse than either Johnson or Abrams.</p>
<p>As it currently stands both directors and franchises are cruising for a bruising, Abrams/Star Wars for repeating themselves and Reeves/Batman for not exceeding the cultural resonance of Nolan&#8217;s dark take on the character. Swapping would serve both series and both directors.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
