https://staging2.theplaylist.net/avengers-infinity-war-to-be-filmed-entirely-with-new-imaxarri-digital-cameras-20150507/ Mon, 23 May 2016 03:30:57 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 https://staging2.theplaylist.net/avengers-infinity-war-to-be-filmed-entirely-with-new-imaxarri-digital-cameras-20150507/#comment-131611 Mon, 23 May 2016 03:30:57 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/avengers-infinity-war-to-be-filmed-entirely-with-new-imaxarri-digital-cameras-264293/#comment-131611 The Alexa65 is basically ARRI\’s answer to the RED Dragon camera. If the Alexa65 is considered "IMAX", then Gone Girl should be too, since it was shot in an even larger resolution. This is like leftover NAB hype.

]]> https://staging2.theplaylist.net/avengers-infinity-war-to-be-filmed-entirely-with-new-imaxarri-digital-cameras-20150507/#comment-131612 Mon, 23 May 2016 03:30:57 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/avengers-infinity-war-to-be-filmed-entirely-with-new-imaxarri-digital-cameras-264293/#comment-131612 "[it] will essentially be a digital version of the Alexa 65" The Alexa 65 is already a digital camera…

]]> https://staging2.theplaylist.net/avengers-infinity-war-to-be-filmed-entirely-with-new-imaxarri-digital-cameras-20150507/#comment-131613 Mon, 23 May 2016 03:30:57 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/avengers-infinity-war-to-be-filmed-entirely-with-new-imaxarri-digital-cameras-264293/#comment-131613 A 65mm digital sensor is a far cry from the overall resolution of film IMAX, but it\’s still a pretty noticeable bump up from from the regular Alexa. It\’s already got Roger Deakins stamp of approval, which should be enough for any film fan to get behind.

]]> https://staging2.theplaylist.net/avengers-infinity-war-to-be-filmed-entirely-with-new-imaxarri-digital-cameras-20150507/#comment-131614 Mon, 23 May 2016 03:30:57 +0000 http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/avengers-infinity-war-to-be-filmed-entirely-with-new-imaxarri-digital-cameras-264293/#comment-131614 "…both for directors, audiences, and films…" That\’s three things and thus can\’t be "both." (Sorry, I\’m an editor.) Nevertheless, I agree that this is a much better approach than 3D — not so much for the surcharge but for the true cinematic experience.

]]>