<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Academy Reportedly Considering Returning To 5 Best Picture Oscar Nominees	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-20150304/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-20150304/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:04:38 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Jeffrey		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-20150304/#comment-135217</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jeffrey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-266620/#comment-135217</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don\&#039;t think the Academy needs to pander to black community organizers or civil rights groups to reinvigorate its popularity.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don\&#8217;t think the Academy needs to pander to black community organizers or civil rights groups to reinvigorate its popularity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Internet Anonymity		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-20150304/#comment-135218</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Internet Anonymity]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-266620/#comment-135218</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I\&#039;ve said it before, I\&#039;ll say it again: get rid of the mostly-awkward musical numbers.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I\&#8217;ve said it before, I\&#8217;ll say it again: get rid of the mostly-awkward musical numbers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benxpete		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-20150304/#comment-135219</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benxpete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-266620/#comment-135219</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[@leon yes, if only the Oscars were on the same artistic and quality based level as Empire...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@leon yes, if only the Oscars were on the same artistic and quality based level as Empire&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Benxpete		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-20150304/#comment-135220</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Benxpete]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-266620/#comment-135220</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This move isn\&#039;t &#034;to expand numbers&#034; as the academy never said that. That was just bad writing or horrible assumptions made in error by the writer of this. The press release clearly says it\&#039;s not, but instead because their initial plan had failed and not accomplished what they set out for. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This move isn\&#8217;t &quot;to expand numbers&quot; as the academy never said that. That was just bad writing or horrible assumptions made in error by the writer of this. The press release clearly says it\&#8217;s not, but instead because their initial plan had failed and not accomplished what they set out for. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: LeonRaymond		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-20150304/#comment-135221</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[LeonRaymond]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-266620/#comment-135221</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Oscar Landscape of limiting in large numbers films and award presenters of color will again show an even more severe ratings drop next year. Until folks will forget that it\&#039;s even being telecast. Empire with all it\&#039;s faults shows you program some for people of color and we will show up in support in large numbers ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Oscar Landscape of limiting in large numbers films and award presenters of color will again show an even more severe ratings drop next year. Until folks will forget that it\&#8217;s even being telecast. Empire with all it\&#8217;s faults shows you program some for people of color and we will show up in support in large numbers </p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: anonymous		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-20150304/#comment-135222</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2016 04:04:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2015/more/uncategorized/academy-reportedly-considering-returning-to-5-best-picture-oscar-nominees-266620/#comment-135222</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I don\&#039;t see how going back to five nominees will help. Expanding the nominees did not water down the prestige,it made the best picture category more interesting. If it was not expanded Zero Dark Thirty, Her, Up, District 9, Winters Bone and others would not have been nominated.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don\&#8217;t see how going back to five nominees will help. Expanding the nominees did not water down the prestige,it made the best picture category more interesting. If it was not expanded Zero Dark Thirty, Her, Up, District 9, Winters Bone and others would not have been nominated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
