<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: &#8216;A Good Day To Die Hard&#8217; Will Be The First &#8216;Die Hard&#8217; Under 2 Hours, Runs Just Over 90 Minutes	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://staging2.theplaylist.net/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-20130130/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-20130130/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:42:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Carlos		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-20130130/#comment-62063</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Carlos]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-102028/#comment-62063</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Is official from FOX???
97 minutes including credits???
They (FOX) have explained why so short???]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is official from FOX???<br />
97 minutes including credits???<br />
They (FOX) have explained why so short???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: fgh		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-20130130/#comment-62064</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[fgh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-102028/#comment-62064</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[1 min in korea? No 
Credits more short.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1 min in korea? No<br />
Credits more short.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: KEN		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-20130130/#comment-62065</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KEN]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-102028/#comment-62065</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In Korea, where it opens on Feb 6th, they cut 1 min to secure 15+ certificate. The official running time of Korean theatrical version is 96 mins.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In Korea, where it opens on Feb 6th, they cut 1 min to secure 15+ certificate. The official running time of Korean theatrical version is 96 mins.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Joel Goodsen		</title>
		<link>https://staging2.theplaylist.net/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-20130130/#comment-62066</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Joel Goodsen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2016 10:42:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.indiewire.com/2013/more/uncategorized/a-good-day-to-die-hard-will-be-the-first-die-hard-under-2-hours-runs-just-over-90-minutes-102028/#comment-62066</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I was wondering if this is a substantiated fact or  just conjecture.  I know this 97 minute run time arose originally from AMC theaters &#034;established&#034; runtime (which very possibly is not correct being that no other theater chain has posted showtimes or an established runtime in addition to the fact that AMC theaters is notorious for posting incorrect runtimes before screenings).  Furthermore,  I have heard possible runtimes for the movie that include 97 mins, 99 mins, 100 mins, 111 mins, 120 mins, and even 130 mins.  So again I was wondering if this blog was based on anything concrete or official?  Thanks.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was wondering if this is a substantiated fact or  just conjecture.  I know this 97 minute run time arose originally from AMC theaters &quot;established&quot; runtime (which very possibly is not correct being that no other theater chain has posted showtimes or an established runtime in addition to the fact that AMC theaters is notorious for posting incorrect runtimes before screenings).  Furthermore,  I have heard possible runtimes for the movie that include 97 mins, 99 mins, 100 mins, 111 mins, 120 mins, and even 130 mins.  So again I was wondering if this blog was based on anything concrete or official?  Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
