Comments on: 5 Things You Might Not Know About ‘The Empire Strikes Back’

By: Tony

Tony — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:00:10 +0000

*I meant prequels

By: Tony

Tony — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:00:10 +0000

Terrible sequels? Revenge of the Sith was better than Return of the Jedi and that new POS Disney just released. Do some research also before you "write" an article!

By: Sarah Goodwich

Sarah Goodwich — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:00:10 +0000

Han was frozen by Darth Vader, not Jabba the Hutt; he wanted to make sure that Luke would survive the freezing-process.

By: brcarthey

brcarthey — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:00:10 +0000

Actually, Luke's "NO!" was in response to (Prowse as) Vader telling Luke that Kenobi killed Luke's father.

By: Stevo the Magnificent

Stevo the Magnificent — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:00:10 +0000

There's a prequel trilogy, when did this happen? In my little world, the 'Star Wars' saga began in 1977 and ended in 1983, period, with 'The Empire Strikes Back' – just that title, none of this 'Episode this-and-that' nonsense – being undoubtedly the best of the three, although it's a pity that production on 'Return of the Jedi' wasn't a little longer so director Richard Marquand could have nailed down the performances more acutely as well as getting all the shots he wanted to shoot (and kept the deleted scenes of Luke building his lightsaber and the rebel assault on the Imperial base on Endor in the final cut), but otherwise, it ended the saga on a strong note, and end there it did (for me certainly)…

By: Mike z.

Mike z. — Sun, 22 May 2016 04:00:10 +0000

You really need to proofread stuff before you put it online. Swap planet?
Hammill a bunch of times? Of instead of off? C'mon man, just cause its on the Internet
doesn't mean your grammar has to suck.